Using only the numbers 3, 3, 3 and 3 once and + - * / once find 7?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natasha1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The puzzle requires using the numbers 3, 3, 3, and 3 once, along with the arithmetic operations +, -, *, and / exactly once, to achieve the result of 7. Participants have attempted various combinations but have found it challenging to reach the target number without repeating operations. Some solutions led to results of 6 or 8, but not 7, leading to speculation about the puzzle's feasibility. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the constraints, including the use of parentheses, which were not explicitly mentioned in the problem. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that achieving 7 under these conditions may not be possible.
Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
Hi,

At the end of our lecture today, the lecturer gave us this simple yet impossible puzzle.

My friend and I have tried to find the answer but in vain...

Using only the numbers 3, 3, 3 and 3 once and using only the four arithmetic + - * / once can you make the number 7.

The closest I have got is 6 or 8 but not 7.

3*3 all / 3 and then + 3 = 6
or
3*3 then - 3/3 = 8

How to find 7?? Is this actually possible?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
3 + 3 + 3/3 = 7
 
think of it in terms of combinatorics with the operators:

3 op1 3 op2 3 op3 3

so there's 4 choices for the first, 3 for the third, 2 for the last one = 24 choices

Phyzguy's solution is almost correct except that he repeated the + operator and the problem says to use each operation once.

3+3-3*3=-3
3+3-3/3=5
3+3*3-3=9
3+3*3/3=6
3+3/3-3=1
3+3/3*3=3.33333

3-3+3*3=9
3-3+3/3=1
3-3*3-3=-9
3-3*3/3=0
3-3/3+3=5
3-3/3*3

...
 
Can't do 3 + 3 + 3/3 = 7 as you are using + twice
 
Are you saying it's therefore impossible?
 
Natasha1 said:
Are you saying it's therefore impossible?

I can't tell you the answer only how to think about the problem as it was assigned by your prof.
 
Pity.
 
Natasha1 said:
Pity.

You can't finish the other 12 choices to complete the proof?
 
are you sure the prof or you have the correct problem?
a classic is using 5 "3" and all the operators

(3*3 + 3)/3 + 3 = 7
 
  • #10
But then you are using + twice too
 
  • #11
3 and 7 are prime numbers. Any combination of operations you try (except for 3/3) will be a multiple of 3. If you use 3/3 = 1, then you'd have to add or subtract the 3/3 to something else, since multiplying would result in a multiple of 3 again, and dividing would result in a fraction.

The problem doesn't state if you're allowed to use parenthesis to group operations.

If you're suppose to used + - * / excactly one, that's four operators, so you'd need five 3's.
 
Back
Top