Using the chain rule on a fraction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative dy/dx for the function y = (1 + s)/(1 - s), where s is defined as s = t - 1/t and t = sqrt(x). Participants are exploring the application of the chain rule and quotient rule in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to combine the chain rule with the quotient rule, expressing confusion about managing multiple variables and derivatives. There are attempts to clarify the relationships between dy/dx, dy/ds, ds/dt, and dt/dx, with some participants questioning the necessity of substituting values for s and t.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their attempts at calculating derivatives and revising their earlier work. Some have expressed uncertainty about their results but are encouraged by others to continue exploring the chain rule approach rather than resorting to direct substitution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of differentiating a function with multiple layers of variables, and there is an ongoing dialogue about the implications of using different methods for finding the derivative.

LilTaru
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find dy/dx at x = 2.

y = (1 + s)/(1 - s); s = t - 1/t; t = sqrt(x)


Homework Equations



I know if f = f(g(x)), then f1(x) = f1(g(x)) * g1(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I may need to combine the chain rule and quotient rule, but all of the separate equations makes it really hard to keep track of all the steps. I have no idea where to even begin! Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The chain rule can also be denoted as \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{du}.\frac{du}{dx} given y=f(u) and u=f(x)

This can obviously be extended to 3 or more variables.
 
I think that is the part that confuses me... would dy/dx in this case be:
dy/ds * ds/dt * dt/dx?
 
Yep, it makes sense doesn't it?

If you look at them as being fractions, then of course \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{ds}.\frac{ds}{dt}.\frac{dt}{dx} since the ds and dt's cancel from the numerator and denominator leaving dy/dx.
The second reason why it should make sense is because since we have y=f(s), s=f(t), t=f(x) then we can only take derivatives as dy/ds, ds/dt, dt/dx respectively.
 
Okay I think I may know what to do, but I am still a bit confused...

Would dy/ds * ds/dt * dt/dx be:

(1 - s)(s) - (1 + s)(-s)/(1 - s)2 * t + 1/t2 * 1/(2sqrt(x))

Since dy/ds = (1 - s)(s) - (1 + s)(-s)/(1 - s)2

ds/dt = t + 1/t2

and dt/dx = 1/(2sqrt(x))

Would I then just plug in for s, and t?
 
dy/ds and ds/dt are both wrong. You need to go back and revise your derivatives since this problem will keep creeping up on you and you'll never make it through the course.
 
Yeah that is the trouble I always have with these questions... how to differentiate it when it contains s and t... I was thinking of plugging in the values of s and t, but wouldn't that defeat the purpose of having them in the first place because I could just plug in the values and use the quotient rule?
 
I tried again and got:

dy/ds = 2/(1 - s)2

ds/dt = 1 + 1/t2

dt/dx = 1/(2sqrt(x))

I don't know if I am still really confused on it, but this seemed more correct to me than my first try... Do I now plug in for s and t or am I still really off base?
 
LilTaru said:
Yeah that is the trouble I always have with these questions... how to differentiate it when it contains s and t... I was thinking of plugging in the values of s and t, but wouldn't that defeat the purpose of having them in the first place because I could just plug in the values and use the quotient rule?
Yes you can do that, but trust me, you don't want to. It will become way too confusing and difficult to take the derivative of. Give it a shot if you want though, just to show yourself how ugly it will look and appreciate this approach much more :smile:

LilTaru said:
I tried again and got:

dy/ds = 2/(1 - s)2

ds/dt = 1 + 1/t2

dt/dx = 1/(2sqrt(x))

I don't know if I am still really confused on it, but this seemed more correct to me than my first try... Do I now plug in for s and t or am I still really off base?
Yes that's correct. Ok now since you're asked to find dy/dx at x=2, you know that since \frac{dt}{dx}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} then t=... and then since you now know t, then s=...? etc.

Of course using the chain rule formula that we already spoke about.
 
  • #10
LilTaru said:
Yeah that is the trouble I always have with these questions... how to differentiate it when it contains s and t... I was thinking of plugging in the values of s and t, but wouldn't that defeat the purpose of having them in the first place because I could just plug in the values and use the quotient rule?
Yes you can do that, but trust me, you don't want to. It will become way too confusing and difficult to take the derivative of. Give it a shot if you want though, just to show yourself how ugly it will look and appreciate this approach much more :smile:

LilTaru said:
I tried again and got:

dy/ds = 2/(1 - s)2

ds/dt = 1 + 1/t2

dt/dx = 1/(2sqrt(x))

I don't know if I am still really confused on it, but this seemed more correct to me than my first try... Do I now plug in for s and t or am I still really off base?
Yes that's correct. Ok now since you're asked to find dy/dx at x=2, you know that since dt/dx=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} then dt/dx=... and then since you now know t, then ds/dt=...? etc.

Of course using the chain rule formula that we already spoke about.
 
  • #11
Okay so to clarify:

Then dt/dx = 1/(2sqrt(2)) = 1/2sqrt(2)

ds/dt = 1 + 1/(sqrt(2))2 = 3/2

dy/ds = 2/(1 - sqrt(2) + 1/sqrt(2))2 = 4/(2 - 2sqrt(2) + 1)

Then just multiply these together for the answer?
 
  • #12
Yes that's perfect! :smile:

Just as a little reminder, sometimes you can clear things up a bit, such as the \sqrt{2}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} but it's nothing really that important here.

Good job by the way.
 
  • #13
Whew! Thank you so much! It really helps! Derivatives always get confusing when they start getting big and complicated! Your help was much appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K