Determine Absolute Speed Using Time Dilation

Gaz
Messages
74
Reaction score
4
So if time dilation is what's left after correcting for the optical effect and we want to know our motion through the universe. We can't use light because we have no reference point to what not being in motion is and there's lots of attempts using light which doesn't work.
Why don't we just take a few atoms we know the decay rate of and send them in different directions. As motion makes them last longer the one's traveling in a direction that reduces there overall motion should last the least amount of time and the one that lasts the least amount of time would not be in motion. Then deducting that motion from our own will give us a reference to what no motion throughout the universe is. Then everything would be a lot more relative =)

Would that work ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Gaz said:
That makes sense. So if time dilation is what's left after correcting for the optical effect and we want to know our motion through the universe. We can't use light because we have no reference point to what not being in motion is and there's lots of attempts using light which doesn't work.
Why don't we just take a few atoms we know the decay rate of and send them in different directions. As motion makes them last longer the one's traveling in a direction that reduces there overall motion should last the least amount of time and the one that lasts the least amount of time would not be in motion. Then deducting that motion from our own will give us a reference to what no motion throughout the universe is. Then everything would be a lot more relative =)

Would that work ?
It would not work: the relativity postulate also works for radioactive decay. For uniform motion we cannot establish a "preferred frame", instead any uniform straight motion reference system is equally suitable for the laws of physics. But to understand how that can be possible, it is necessary to understand "relativity of simultaneity".
 
Although we send them in different directions, they will show the same amount of time dilation relative to us. Furthermore, if someone moving relative to us tries this experiment, they will get the exact same results as well.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top