Using two duct silencers in series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
Using two duct silencers in series does not guarantee a cumulative 20 dB reduction in sound, as sound can travel around the silencers and through other paths. Real-world scenarios often involve additional noise sources, such as duct radiation or flow noise, which can affect overall sound levels. A practical example highlighted a situation where adding a second enclosure did not reduce noise as expected due to sound escaping through the floor. If the primary noise source is effectively managed, two 10 dB silencers could achieve the desired reduction. Ultimately, the effectiveness of using two silencers depends on the specific sound environment and any alternative noise pathways present.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
Consider a straight duct silencer of any sort. If you place two of them in series, how will that affect the sound? If one silencer results in a 10 dB reduction for a specific frequency, will using two result in 20? It just seems like too much of an easy answer so I thought I would check with people here :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are correct, it's too much of an easy answer. If there are no other sound travel paths, yes. In the real world, however, things are different because sound also travels around the silencer.

I once worked on a machine that was extremely noisy. With a normal (for that company) noise enclosure the sound was about 105 dB. I said to put the machine on vibration isolators, another engineer said to add a second noise enclosure around the first one. I was new there, he was well connected with management, so they built a second noise enclosure over the first. When they measured the noise level at 105 dB, they called me back. Standing ten feet from the machine, I pointed the meter at the machine and measured 105 dB, pointed the meter away from the machine and measured 105 dB, pointed the meter down toward the floor and measured 107 dB. The noise was going under the noise enclosure through the concrete floor. They put in the vibration isolators and got the machine down to the 80 dB called for in the contract.

If the silencer is improved enough, the primary noise source will be something else. It could be noise radiated from the duct, it could be from the fan inlet or outlet, it could be flow noise after the silencer. On the other hand, if the other noise sources are small enough compared the duct noise, then two 10 dB silencers in series will result in 20 dB reduction.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and russ_watters
jrmichler said:
You are correct, it's too much of an easy answer. If there are no other sound travel paths, yes. In the real world, however, things are different because sound also travels around the silencer.

In this case there actually shouldn't be any other path available. The machinery sits in a room which has a wall that also has it's requirements regarding sound transfer. The only open path through the wall is the duct on which I plan to install the silencer(s).
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top