Valance and conduction band in solid.

PhysicsBegner
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a very basic question on formation of valance and conduction band. It is said that conduction band is above the valance band.

So In a hypothetical lithium molecule formation(for example purpose) : If 100 Lithium atoms combine together, then 1S shell is split into 100 1S shells (one 1S shell and 99 shells closer to it) with 2 electrons each. And 2S shell smiliarly splitted into 100 shells.

In the above example can we say band of energy levesl formed by 1s shell as valance and band of energy levels fromed by 2s energy levels as conduction.

Please correct me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say the issue is more complicated than this simple treatment. The valence and conduction bands are merely names just to simplify the complicated wave function that takes place due to the combination of the atoms in the space. The 1S "orbit" is not called 1S anymore in quantum mechanics when it's a combination of more than 1 atom, because it's not simply the superposition of the two quantum states. The names become more complicated.

Generally, in solid state physics, we are not concerned at all about individual atoms. I don't know why you're asking this question, maybe you just want to feel more understanding for the matter, but this isn't the right way I guess.

Hope this gave you the picture.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. I wanted to ask this question because I had a doubt of whether the valance band woluld be formed with electrons in the valance shell of atom. Because some textbooks in electronics co-rellates valance band and valance shell in an atom. And I was wondering then from which part of electrons the conduction band would be formed.
 
I don't disagree with what TheDestroyer said, but I just want to say that I took a chemistry class in which they explained energy bands in exactly the way you described it, so I think some chemists do think of it this way. Even if it's no longer meaningful to talk about 2s states, orbitals, or whatever, I think these are indeed the states that went into forming the conduction band.
 
Thank you, If this classical way of explaining band formation in solid is correct. Could we logically think that nucleous of all atoms are at one point; since we say valance band is nearer to atom's nucleous and conduction ban is far away from nulceous?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top