Validity of Newton's 2nd Law in accelerating ref. frame and constant v.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of Newton's 2nd Law in different reference frames, specifically comparing a stationary frame with a moving frame at constant velocity and an accelerating frame. The original poster presents a problem from an applied modern physics course, questioning the applicability of the law under these conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to demonstrate that Newton's 2nd Law holds in a moving frame with constant velocity but fails in an accelerating frame. Some participants question the transformation of velocity and its implications for the law's validity.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the differences between the two scenarios presented in the problem. Some have offered insights into the nature of forces in accelerating frames, while others are clarifying the relationships between velocities in different reference frames. There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions made regarding time and acceleration.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of resources, such as a textbook, which may affect their understanding of the concepts discussed. Additionally, the problem is part of a non-required homework set, indicating a level of uncertainty in the original poster's conclusions.

Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
First of all I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this problem.

Homework Statement


Given that [itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m[itex]\overline{a}[/itex] is valid in the lab frame S, show that:
(a) it is also valid in a moving frame S' with a constant velocity relative to S,
but (b) invalid in a moving frame with a changing velocity (ie, a frame S' accelerating relative to S).
Assume the force and mass are invariant

Homework Equations


The Galilean transformation.
Newtons 2nd law



The Attempt at a Solution


This is a non-required problem in the first homework set for an applied modern physics (sophomore level) course I'm taking. We have only had one lecture and I don't have the textbook so I'm not sure if the conclusions I've drawn are correct

So we have two reference frames S and S', with respective coordinates (x,y,z,t) and (x',y',z',t'). But we can use just (x,t) and (x',t') and draw the same conclusions. S' is moving relative to S with a constant velocity [itex]\overline{v}[/itex] in part (a) and with an acceleration [itex]\overline{κ}[/itex] in part (b). I believe t=t' must also be assumed as the concept of absolute time still exists in Newtonian mechanics.

For part (a)
In S
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d2x/dt2)=m(d[itex]\overline{u}[/itex]/dt) (Where [itex]\overline{u}[/itex] is the velocity measured in S)

The Galilean transformation gives this relationship between [itex]\overline{u}[/itex] and [itex]\overline{u'}[/itex] (velocity as measured in S')

[itex]\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{v}[/itex]

In S'
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d([itex]\overline{u'}+\overline{v}/dt[/itex])

if [itex]\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{v}[/itex] then [itex]\overline{a'}[/itex]= ([itex]d(\overline{u'}+\overline{v})[/itex]/dt)) should equal the same acceleration [itex]\overline{a}[/itex] measured in S. Thus if the force and mass are invariant as well, the 2nd law holds for a moving reference frame with some constant velocity [itex]\overline{v}[/itex].



For part (b) when S' is accelerating relative to S

Similarly in S
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d2x/dt2)=m(d[itex]\overline{u}[/itex]/dt)

##\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{κ}##

##\overline{F}=m(d(\overline{u'}+\overline{κ})/dt)##

Thus ##\overline{F}=m\overline{a'}+m(d\overline{κ}/dt)## where ##(d\overline{κ}/dt)## is the jerk of ##\overline{κ}##

I believe this shows that the 2nd Law is not valid for an accelerating reference frame.

I would greatly appreciate any corrections and comments you can provide!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hakkinen said:
For part (b) when S' is accelerating relative to S

Similarly in S
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d2x/dt2)=m(d[itex]\overline{u}[/itex]/dt)

##\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{κ}##
It is not true: The velocity transforms as

[itex]\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{v}[/itex]

ehild
 
If that is the case then how is the result different from part (a)?
 
The velocity of the frame of reference changes with time: its time derivative is equal to κ

ehild
 
Ah I Think I understand now.

## \overline{u'}=\overline{u}-\overline{v}##

## \frac{d\overline{u'}}{dt} = \frac{d\overline{u}}{dt}-\overline{κ} ##

##\overline{F}=m\frac{d\overline{u'}}{dt}+ m \overline{κ} ##

Is this correct?
 
Yes, there is a new force in the accelerating frame, which does not belong to any interaction between bodies. That force pushes you forward in a braking car.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K