Validity of Newton's 2nd Law in accelerating ref. frame and constant v.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
First of all I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this problem.

Homework Statement


Given that [itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m[itex]\overline{a}[/itex] is valid in the lab frame S, show that:
(a) it is also valid in a moving frame S' with a constant velocity relative to S,
but (b) invalid in a moving frame with a changing velocity (ie, a frame S' accelerating relative to S).
Assume the force and mass are invariant

Homework Equations


The Galilean transformation.
Newtons 2nd law



The Attempt at a Solution


This is a non-required problem in the first homework set for an applied modern physics (sophomore level) course I'm taking. We have only had one lecture and I don't have the textbook so I'm not sure if the conclusions I've drawn are correct

So we have two reference frames S and S', with respective coordinates (x,y,z,t) and (x',y',z',t'). But we can use just (x,t) and (x',t') and draw the same conclusions. S' is moving relative to S with a constant velocity [itex]\overline{v}[/itex] in part (a) and with an acceleration [itex]\overline{κ}[/itex] in part (b). I believe t=t' must also be assumed as the concept of absolute time still exists in Newtonian mechanics.

For part (a)
In S
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d2x/dt2)=m(d[itex]\overline{u}[/itex]/dt) (Where [itex]\overline{u}[/itex] is the velocity measured in S)

The Galilean transformation gives this relationship between [itex]\overline{u}[/itex] and [itex]\overline{u'}[/itex] (velocity as measured in S')

[itex]\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{v}[/itex]

In S'
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d([itex]\overline{u'}+\overline{v}/dt[/itex])

if [itex]\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{v}[/itex] then [itex]\overline{a'}[/itex]= ([itex]d(\overline{u'}+\overline{v})[/itex]/dt)) should equal the same acceleration [itex]\overline{a}[/itex] measured in S. Thus if the force and mass are invariant as well, the 2nd law holds for a moving reference frame with some constant velocity [itex]\overline{v}[/itex].



For part (b) when S' is accelerating relative to S

Similarly in S
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d2x/dt2)=m(d[itex]\overline{u}[/itex]/dt)

##\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{κ}##

##\overline{F}=m(d(\overline{u'}+\overline{κ})/dt)##

Thus ##\overline{F}=m\overline{a'}+m(d\overline{κ}/dt)## where ##(d\overline{κ}/dt)## is the jerk of ##\overline{κ}##

I believe this shows that the 2nd Law is not valid for an accelerating reference frame.

I would greatly appreciate any corrections and comments you can provide!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hakkinen said:
For part (b) when S' is accelerating relative to S

Similarly in S
[itex]\overline{F}[/itex]=m(d2x/dt2)=m(d[itex]\overline{u}[/itex]/dt)

##\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{κ}##
It is not true: The velocity transforms as

[itex]\overline{u}=\overline{u'}+\overline{v}[/itex]

ehild
 
If that is the case then how is the result different from part (a)?
 
Ah I Think I understand now.

## \overline{u'}=\overline{u}-\overline{v}##

## \frac{d\overline{u'}}{dt} = \frac{d\overline{u}}{dt}-\overline{κ} ##

##\overline{F}=m\frac{d\overline{u'}}{dt}+ m \overline{κ} ##

Is this correct?