Van der pauw resistance question

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamlovelyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
iamlovelyboy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
All,
Why is it that Van der pauw resistance eliminates contact resistance issues when measuring sheet resistance using this method when compared to the 2 terminal msmt?
can someone please enlighten me?
Thank you

Lovelyboy
UC Irvine grad student.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi...
i did go through this...but it doesn't answer my question... if you know the answer can you please help me?
 
I'm not real strong on this, so it may not be entirely correct.

The 2D sheet can be thought of as an array of resistors.
Using 2 contacts you just get the resistance of the entire array.
With the four contacts you can compute the resistance of an effective 1D sheet, without the artifacts that an actual 1D sheet might introduce.
Not particularly important unless you want to work with the Hall effect where the carrier density across the sheet is not going to be a constant.