Variable exponent causing number of singularities to change for residue?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing the singularities and residues of the function \(\frac{z^{-k}}{z+1}\) for \(0 < k < 1\). A simple pole is identified at \(z = -1\), with the residue calculated as \(R(-1) = (-1)^{-k}\). As \(k\) approaches 1, a simple pole emerges at \(z = 0\), while for \(k\) approaching 0, no singularity exists at \(z = 0\). The presence of variable exponents introduces complexities, leading to multiple residues depending on the branch cuts chosen, particularly when considering roots like \(1/n\) or irrational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, particularly singularities and residues.
  • Familiarity with the residue theorem and its applications.
  • Knowledge of Laurent series expansions.
  • Experience with branch cuts in complex functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the residue theorem in detail, focusing on its application to functions with variable exponents.
  • Study Laurent series expansions and their role in determining residues.
  • Investigate the implications of branch cuts in complex analysis, particularly for non-integer powers.
  • Utilize Mathematica to numerically analyze singularities and residues for various values of \(k\).
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in complex analysis, mathematicians dealing with singularities, and anyone interested in advanced residue calculations involving variable exponents.

newmike
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the nature of the singularities of the following function and evaluate the residues.

\frac{z^{-k}}{z+1}

for 0 < k < 1


Homework Equations



Residue theorem, Laurent expansions, etc.


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok this is a weird one since we've never covered anything with a non integer exponent, in fact, never with a variable exponent at all.

I realize there is a simple pole at z=-1. If I assume the numerator to be analytic and non-zero at z=-1 (which I think it true for the range of k), then I can calculate the residue at z=-1 by the simple formula: R(-1) = g(-1) / h'(-1), where g(z) is the numerator and h(z) is the denominator. If I carry through with that I get R(-1) = (-1)^(-k) which I am ok with I guess.

The problem is that I don't know what to do with the potential pole as k approaches 1. In that case we'd approach a simple pole at z=0. Alternatively, as k approached 0, we do not have a singularity at z=0 at all. So how do I handle the fact that this is a variable??

Should I try to turn this into a laurent series and go from there?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert but would like to start the analysis. Perhaps others more qualified can comment as well. We have

\frac{1}{z^k(z+1)}

and take for example:

\frac{1}{z^{1/2}(z+1)}

We can choose the branch-cut along the positive real axis (0,infty). In that case, there are two analytic branches around the pole so two residues:

\mathop\text{Res}\limits_{z=-1}\left\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{z}(z+1)}\right\}=\pm \frac{1}{i}

Likewise for any rational root say 1/n, there will be n residues, one corresponding to each determination of the root.

I'm not sure if the root is irrational if there will be any analytic branches around the pole. Take for example:

\frac{1}{z^{1/\pi}(z+1)}

I suspect there are an infinite number of analytic determinations around the pole in this case and thus an infinite number of residues.

And since k is never one, the origin in the range 0<k<1 always remains a branch point.

Also, not too hard to numerically confirm this in Mathematica for test cases although will have to do so manually since Mathematica will always choose the negative real axis for the branch-cut.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K