Variable strength electric motor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of designing a variable strength electric motor, exploring ideas related to changing magnetic field strength and its effects on motor performance. Participants consider various configurations, including the use of cone-shaped designs, the arrangement of magnets, and the implications of using different types of magnets in motors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a cone-shaped motor design that allows for sliding magnets to adjust their proximity to the stators, potentially changing the motor's strength.
  • Another participant suggests that changing the distance between magnets could achieve the same effect without the need for a cone shape.
  • A different viewpoint criticizes the initial design as illogical and proposes using centrifugal force to increase repulsion forces instead.
  • One participant discusses the use of pulse width modulation (PWM) for power control and suggests switching coils on and off as an alternative method for adjusting motor performance.
  • A participant explains the relationship between magnet strength and motor speed, noting that weaker magnets can lead to faster motor speeds under certain conditions.
  • Another participant likens the effect of changing magnet strength to changing gears in a car, questioning the torque response associated with this analogy.
  • Concerns about efficiency are raised, with one participant stating that stronger magnets could lead to reduced copper losses due to fewer windings.
  • A participant expresses interest in applying these concepts to an electric version of a Lamborghini Aventador, while also considering the challenges posed by battery weight and performance specifications compared to gas engines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the proposed motor design and its implications, with no clear consensus reached. Some ideas are challenged, and multiple competing views on the effectiveness and efficiency of different approaches remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the potential inefficiencies associated with the proposed designs and the implications of using different types of magnets, but do not resolve the complexities involved in these considerations.

GreenAce92
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
The title may seem dumb because increase in voltage but

I wanted to have sort of like a transmission for an electric motor which again... increase in voltage which may make this idea unnecessary but

I wanted to have a motor that was built like a cone within a cone so that you could slide the magnets in and out which would change the strength of the motor by changing the proximity of the magnets to the stators while it rotated.

Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • WP_20141113_002.jpg
    WP_20141113_002.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 445
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah - you can change the torque that the motor can produce by changing the magnetic field strength - which you do by moving the magnets.
But no need for cone shape - just change how far apart the magnets are.
 
yeah pretty lame design, not even logical

I would go off something like centrifugal force making the tolerance higher and higher consequently increasing the repulsion forces
 
You could go with a number of coils that you can switch on and off or pulse width modulation?

Pulse width modulation (PWM) is normally the most effective for control of the power. But if you want to change the number of poles (If the magnet is on the rotor then you're going to have a hard time changing magnet slots) I would say make a number of coils that you can switch on and off. It'll complicate things more so than PWM but it would also be an interesting concept.
 
Changing magnets in a motor can have apparently strange effects...For example ...

Lets say you have a DC permanent magnet motor with no load. When you apply a DC voltage to it the motor will accelerate until the back emf is roughly equal to the applied voltage. OK so far?

If you then substitute weaker magnets the motor will have to spin faster to achieve the same back emf.
If you substitute stronger magnets the motor will spin slower to achieve the same back emf.

So making your magnets weaker can make your motor go faster.

For this reason if you replace a ferrite magnet motor with a rare Earth magnet motor you typically have to reduce the number of turns if you want the motor constant to remain the same.
 
CWatters said:
If you then substitute weaker magnets the motor will have to spin faster to achieve the same back emf.
If you substitute stronger magnets the motor will spin slower to achieve the same back emf.

So this is like changing gears in a car. Weaker magnets would be like 5th gear and stronger magnets would be like 1st gear. Would you also get the appropriate torque response?
 
Inefficient
 
So it would be an AC motor then, no magnets.

Yeah I wanted to apply it to a Lamborghini Aventador, but I want to match the same specifications as a gas version which my friend argues is not really possible or likely due to weight of batteries and turbocharging of gas motors.

Still, I also want it to be stick which could be a simple voltage range limiter engaged by an artificial clutch. The sound is just horrendous in my opinion...

Thank you all for your time.
 
Plant_Boy said:
So this is like changing gears in a car. Weaker magnets would be like 5th gear and stronger magnets would be like 1st gear. Would you also get the appropriate torque response?

To some extent but it would be inefficient. For something like an electric car you want maximum efficiency. Stronger magnets mean fewer windings which means reduced copper losses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Plant_Boy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K