Variance of a point chosen at random on the circumference of a circle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the variance of coordinates of points randomly chosen on the circumference of a circle, as well as on the surface of a sphere. Participants explore the implications of different methods for generating these points and the associated statistical properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether to generate points using Cartesian coordinates or polar coordinates, questioning the implications of each method on the variance calculations. There is consideration of the symmetry between the x and y coordinates and the independence of their squared values. Some participants suggest using the expected value of the sum of squares to derive variance.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and questions regarding the assumptions made in the problem, particularly concerning the independence of variables and the uniformity of the distribution of points. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the validity of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify the center of the circle, leading to assumptions about it being at the origin. There is also a discussion about the nature of randomness in point selection and the implications for the uniformity of the distribution along the circle's circumference.

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
Homework Statement
Let us randomly generate points ##(x,y)## on the circumference of a circle (two dimensions).
(a) What is Var(x)?
(b) What if you randomly generate points on the surface of a sphere instead?
Relevant Equations
Variance
Hi,

I was looking at this problem and just having a go at it.

Question:
Let us randomly generate points ##(x,y)## on the circumference of a circle (two dimensions).
(a) What is ##\text{Var}(x)##?
(b) What if you randomly generate points on the surface of a sphere instead?

Attempt:
In terms of understanding the question, I think I have to understand whether we pick ##X## or are picking ##\theta##. In my mind, if we are picking ##X## from a uniform distribution, then the variance will just be ## \frac{(b - a)^2}{12} = \frac{r^2}{3} ##, which isn't particularly difficult (so I don't think it would justify being asked in an interview). Also, I feel like then the choice of ##Y## isn't random as it is restricted to two points for a given choice of ##X##. Therefore, to ensure that the point picked is truly random, it made more sense to me (perhaps I am wrong) to pick a ##\theta## measured from axis and then ## x = r cos(\theta) ## and ## y = r sin(\theta) ##.

Proceeding with the ##\theta## argument: ## \theta## will be from a uniform distribution between ##0## and ##2\pi ## with probability ## \frac{1}{2\pi} ##. Then we would need to transform the distribution of ## \theta ## to the distribution for ## X ##

X = r cos(\theta) \rightarrow p(x) dx = p(\theta) d\theta \rightarrow p(x) = p(\theta) |\frac{d\theta}{dx}|
p(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{|\frac{dx}{d\theta}|} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{r sin(\theta)} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}

and then proceed with some integration to find ##Var(X)##... However, I feel like there ought to be a more elegant method of reaching the solution?

Would appreciate any advice/tips outlining where I have gone astray. Thanks in advance.

[EDIT]: changed the pdf of ##\theta## to ##\frac{1}{2\pi}## as it should be. Apologies.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What about considering ##E(x^2 + y^2)##?
 
PeroK said:
What about considering ##E(x^2 + y^2)##?
Thanks @PeroK ! I hadn't considered this at all. Would we hope to exploit a symmetry between ##x## and ##y## with this method?

The reason I ask is because I am thinking along these lines - although I really ought to give this more thought:
E(x^2 + y^2) = E(r^2) = r^2

Then, this is where my hand-waiving starts and I can't yet fully convince myself of the mathematics. If we assume ##x^2## and ##y^2## are independent (not sure how fair this is), then:
E(x^2 + y^2) = E(x^2) + E(y^2) = r^2
Then, if we exploit a symmetry between ##x## and ##y##, then we can let (again, very hand wavy) ##E(x^2) = E(y^2) ##. This doesn't feel right.

Nonetheless, ##Var(X) = E(X^2) - [E(X)]^2 = E(X^2) ## becase ##E(X) = 0##. Which leads us to ##Var(X) = \frac{r^2}{2}##. Now this method makes the independence and symmetry assumptions, which I am not truly convinced hold.

I'll keep thinking about this though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Looks good to me!
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
PeroK said:
Looks good to me!
Oh wow! Thanks @PeroK . Just a few follow up questions I had:

1) What made you think about considering ##E(x^2 + y^2)## to start off with?
2) Why do the independence and symmetry properties hold for this question?

3) For part (b), I am guessing we could do a similar method with ##E(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)## and, after making the same assumptions, end up with ##\frac{r^2}{3}##?
 
Master1022 said:
Homework Statement: Let us randomly generate points on the circumference of a circle (two dimensions).

Master1022 said:
E(x^2 + y^2) = E(r^2) = r^2

Are we assuming "a circle" must be a circle with center (0,0) ?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Are we assuming "a circle" must be a circle with center (0,0) ?
I believe so. The problem doesn't say, but I just assumed that we were.
 
To check that ##E(x^2+y^2) = E(x^2)+E(y^2)## you could pick a few random points and check it out. It's not that ##x## and ##y## are independent, it's that expectation is additive. This should be easy to prove.

There is an obvious symmetry in ##x## and ##y## values round the circle.

You just need to remove the false assumption of independence.
 
PeroK said:
To check that ##E(x^2+y^2) = E(x^2)+E(y^2)## you could pick a few random points and check it out. It's not that ##x## and ##y## are independent, it's that expectation is additive. This should be easy to prove.
Sure thing, the additive property is clear to me. I think I was getting confused with variance, for which there is the extra covariance term for sums of variables.

PeroK said:
There is an obvious symmetry in ##x## and ##y## values round the circle.
Agreed

PeroK said:
You just need to remove the false assumption of independence.
Okay many thanks - this makes more sense
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #10
Master1022 said:
to ensure that the point picked is truly random
That doesn't really mean anything. You can have a 'random' variable the distribution of which only allows one value.
What I presume you intend is that the distribution is uniform along the arc of the circle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K