Variance of bootstrap sample of size n

ghostyc
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/6060/98259799.jpg

I have done part one and found that the bias is \frac{\theta}{n}

then i don't know how to proceed.

in my notes, have the following result,

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/9699/resultc.jpg

i am thinking, this time i have to find the bias in \hat{\theta^*}
then, if i work through, i got it's unbiased...

am i doing something wrong?

I am confused with that, the result in my notes, is it for the mean of the sample?

but here, we are aksed for the population variance?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
(ii) is asking about theta star HAT, not theta star BAR.
 
EnumaElish said:
(ii) is asking about theta star HAT, not theta star BAR.

i will look into it again
sometimes, i really get confused what i am looking for
 
EnumaElish said:
(ii) is asking about theta star HAT, not theta star BAR.

I am now working on the bias is

<br /> \bar{\theta}^{*} - \hat{\theta} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i^* - \bar{y} )^2 - \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - \bar{y} )^2<br />
after some munipulation , i got to

<br /> <br /> \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \left( {y_i^*}^2 - y_i^2 -2\bar{y} (y_i^*+y_i) \right)<br /> <br />

then i take expectation, i got stuck again...
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top