Variation of Laplace-Beltrami wrt metric tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the stress/pressure tensor in statistical mechanics using the variation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator with respect to the metric tensor. The user presents a formulation for the pressure tensor, Pαβ, based on the free energy functional, \mathcal{F}, which incorporates the potential V(ρ) and its derivatives. The user expresses uncertainty regarding the inclusion of derivatives of the metric tensor and the potential in the final expression for the pressure tensor. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the role of the Christoffel symbols and the correct application of tensor calculus in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Tensor calculus fundamentals
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of the Laplace-Beltrami operator
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator with respect to the metric tensor
  • Explore the role of Christoffel symbols in tensor calculus
  • Investigate variations of functionals in the context of general relativity
  • Review the mathematical foundations of pressure tensors in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics, general relativity, and tensor calculus applications.

Päällikkö
Homework Helper
Messages
516
Reaction score
11
I have a very limited knowledge of tensor calculus, and I've never had proper exposure to general relativity, but I hope that the people reading this forum are able to help out.

So I'm doing some stat. mech. and a part of a system's free energy is
\mathcal{F} = \int V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho dx
I'd like to derive the stress/pressure tensor. According to a reference, taking linear combinations of all symmetric tensors s.t. the equilibrium condition is satisfied (div P = 0), I should get the form
P_{\alpha\beta} = ((\mu \rho - f) + (\nabla V(\rho))\cdot (\nabla\rho) + V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho)\delta_{\alpha\beta} - \partial_\alpha V(\rho)\partial_\beta\rho - \partial_\alpha \rho\partial_\beta V(\rho)
where \mu = \frac{\delta\mathcal{F}}{\delta \rho}, f = V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho
Ok, I thought, I want to test out a rather obscure reference from 30 years ago, where a form for the pressure tensor was derived as
\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{g}P_{\alpha\beta} = \frac{\delta \mathcal{F}}{\delta g^{\alpha\beta}}
So writing the free energy in generalized coordinates, I suppose I'd get something like
\mathcal{F} = \int \sqrt{g}V(\rho) \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_i(\sqrt{g}g^{ij}\rho_{,j}) dx
Taking the variation, I'm led to believe that I get EDIT: I believe this is wrong, as the variation depends on derivatives of gij as well. Using this fact and the Cristoffel symbols, for the final operator, I think I might get somewhere
P_{\alpha\beta} = (\mu \rho - f)g_{\alpha\beta} + 2\frac{\partial f}{\partial g^{\alpha\beta}}
where f = V(\rho) \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_i(\sqrt{g}g^{ij}\rho_{,j})

This means I should take the derivative of the Laplace-Beltrami operator wrt the metric tensor. I tried using different identities for the derivatives of √g, but couldn't get where I wanted to. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm a bit worried that the derivatives on V might not appear on the final form, as they do in the reference (derived through a different route).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
823
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K