I have a very limited knowledge of tensor calculus, and I've never had proper exposure to general relativity, but I hope that the people reading this forum are able to help out.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So I'm doing some stat. mech. and a part of a system's free energy is

[tex]\mathcal{F} = \int V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho dx[/tex]

I'd like to derive the stress/pressure tensor. According to a reference, taking linear combinations of all symmetric tensors s.t. the equilibrium condition is satisfied (div P = 0), I should get the form

[tex]P_{\alpha\beta} = ((\mu \rho - f) + (\nabla V(\rho))\cdot (\nabla\rho) + V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho)\delta_{\alpha\beta} - \partial_\alpha V(\rho)\partial_\beta\rho - \partial_\alpha \rho\partial_\beta V(\rho) [/tex]

where [itex]\mu = \frac{\delta\mathcal{F}}{\delta \rho}[/itex], [itex]f = V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho[/itex]

Ok, I thought, I want to test out a rather obscure reference from 30 years ago, where a form for the pressure tensor was derived as

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{g}P_{\alpha\beta} = \frac{\delta \mathcal{F}}{\delta g^{\alpha\beta}}[/tex]

So writing the free energy in generalized coordinates, I suppose I'd get something like

[tex]\mathcal{F} = \int \sqrt{g}V(\rho) \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_i(\sqrt{g}g^{ij}\rho_{,j}) dx[/tex]

Taking the variation, I'm led to believe that I get EDIT: I believe this is wrong, as the variation depends on derivatives of g^{ij}as well. Using this fact and the Cristoffel symbols, for the final operator, I think I might get somewhere

[tex]P_{\alpha\beta} = (\mu \rho - f)g_{\alpha\beta} + 2\frac{\partial f}{\partial g^{\alpha\beta}} [/tex]

where [itex]f = V(\rho) \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_i(\sqrt{g}g^{ij}\rho_{,j})[/itex]

This means I should take the derivative of the Laplace-Beltrami operator wrt the metric tensor. I tried using different identities for the derivatives of √g, but couldn't get where I wanted to. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm a bit worried that the derivatives on V might not appear on the final form, as they do in the reference (derived through a different route).

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Variation of Laplace-Beltrami wrt metric tensor

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Variation Laplace Beltrami | Date |
---|---|

A Variation of scalar field action | Jan 21, 2018 |

A Derive the Bianchi identities from a variational principle? | Oct 5, 2017 |

I Variation of perfect fluid and Lie derivative | Jun 12, 2017 |

The 4-D Laplace equation and wave equation | Feb 10, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**