I Variation of Metric and the Energy-Momentum Tensor: Where Am I Going Wrong?

Gaussian97
Homework Helper
Messages
683
Reaction score
412
TL;DR Summary
I find two different expressions for the EM tensor for dust, and both derivations seem right to me.
Given the action ##S =-\sum m_q \int \sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}^\mu_q(\lambda)\dot{x}^\nu_q(\lambda)} d\lambda## The Energy-Momentum Tensor (EMT) is defined by the variation of the metric
$$\delta S = \frac{1}{2}\int T_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \sqrt{g} d^4x$$
Then I use two different approaches, first one, because I want to vary ##g^{\mu\nu}## I find it better to write ##S =-\sum m_q \int \sqrt{g^{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)} d\lambda##. Then
$$\delta S = -\sum m_q \int \frac{\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}{2\sqrt{g^{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}} \delta g^{\mu\nu}d\lambda$$
And multiplying by ##1=\int \delta^{(4)}(x^\mu - x^{\mu}_q(\lambda))\frac{\sqrt{g}}{\sqrt{g}} d^4x##
$$\delta S = -\frac{1}{2}\sum m_q \int \frac{\delta^{(4)}(x^\mu - x^{\mu}_q(\lambda))\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}{\sqrt{g}\sqrt{g^{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}} \delta g^{\mu\nu}d\lambda \sqrt{g}d^4x$$
Giving
$$T_{\mu\nu} = -\sum m_q \int \frac{\delta^{(4)}(x^\mu - x^{\mu}_q(\lambda))\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}{\sqrt{g}\sqrt{g^{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}} d\lambda$$

The second approach, doing the variation to ##g_{\mu\nu}##, doing exactly the same I get
$$\delta S = -\frac{1}{2}\sum m_q \int \frac{\delta^{(4)}(x^\mu - x^{\mu}_q(\lambda))\dot{x}^\mu_{q}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q}^\nu(\lambda)}{\sqrt{g}\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}_{q}^\mu(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q}^\nu(\lambda)}} \delta g_{\mu\nu}d\lambda \sqrt{g}d^4x$$
Now, because ##0=\delta(g_{\mu\nu}g^{\nu\lambda})## we must have ##\delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\alpha}g_{\nu\beta}\delta g^{\alpha\beta}## so I find
$$\delta S = \frac{1}{2}\sum m_q \int \frac{\delta^{(4)}(x^\mu - x^{\mu}_q(\lambda))\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}{\sqrt{g}\sqrt{g^{\mu\nu}[x_q(\lambda)]\dot{x}_{q\mu}(\lambda)\dot{x}_{q\nu}(\lambda)}} \delta g^{\mu\nu}d\lambda \sqrt{g}d^4x$$

Giving an EMT equal, but with a negative sign. The second one seems better because gives an energy density bounded for below, while the first one not, but I don't see any mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I found the same problem trying to compute the Stress-energy tensor for a scalar particle with action
$$S = \int \left[\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\partial^\mu\partial^\nu - V(\phi)\right]\sqrt{g}d^4x$$
Doing a variation ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## I get
$$\delta S = \int \frac{1}{2}\delta g_{\mu\nu}\partial^{\mu}\phi\partial^{\nu}\phi\sqrt{g}d^4x + \frac{1}{2}\int \left[\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi-V(\phi)\right]g^{\alpha\beta}\delta g_{\alpha\beta}d^4x$$
which gives
$$T_{\mu\nu} = -\partial_\mu\phi \partial_\nu\phi - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu}\delta_\alpha \phi \delta^\alpha \phi + g_{\mu\nu} V(\phi)$$
While doing a variation ##\delta g^{\mu\nu}## I get
$$\delta S = \int \frac{1}{2}\delta g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi\sqrt{g}d^4x - \frac{1}{2}\int \left[\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\partial^{\mu}\phi\partial^{\nu}\phi-V(\phi)\right]g_{\alpha\beta}\delta g^{\alpha\beta}d^4x$$
That gives an EMT
$$T_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu\phi \partial_\nu\phi - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu}\delta_\alpha \phi \delta^\alpha \phi + g_{\mu\nu} V(\phi)$$

So I don't know what I'm doing wrong but definitely, there's some conceptual error that I'm doing here.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top