Varitaion on the twin paradox that just doesnt work out for me

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a variation of the twin paradox, specifically exploring the implications of a scenario where a spaceship bends space through higher dimensions to return to Earth without traditional movement. Participants examine the effects of this scenario on the aging of the twins involved, considering both classical and alternative spacetime metrics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where the ship bends space to return to Earth without movement, seeking clarification on the implications for aging.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to define the spacetime metric and the worldlines of each twin to calculate proper time, noting that this is a classical approach.
  • Some participants argue that if both the ship and Earth are considered to be traveling at near the speed of light, each would perceive the other as older, raising questions about the nature of aging in this context.
  • It is asserted that the twin paradox fundamentally concerns real aging rather than coordinate time dilation, challenging the relevance of speed in the discussion.
  • A participant explains that the motion of objects is represented by curves in spacetime, and that proper time is measured along these curves, regardless of the spacetime model used.
  • Concerns are raised about the asymmetry in spacetime metrics and the implications of an instantaneous return trip, questioning the definition of simultaneity in different frames of reference.
  • Another participant introduces concepts of time travel involving gravitational fields and wormholes, suggesting scenarios where one twin could end up younger or travel back in time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the proposed scenario, with no consensus reached on the effects of the bending of space or the nature of simultaneity in this context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of aging and the mechanics of the proposed variation of the twin paradox.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for a clear definition of the spacetime metric and the assumptions regarding instantaneous travel, which complicate the analysis of aging in the proposed scenario.

Natman3400
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So if you were to take the twin paradox, but make it so instead of the ship turning around and going to earth, the ship bends space through higher dimensions to return to Earth with no movement, what happens then? I'm sure this has been thought up of before, but i can't find an explanation that works out for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In all variations of the twin paradox, we assume the age of the twin is the proper time elapsed along his worldline. So define your spacetime metric (this can be curved and includee wormholes etc), define the worldline of each twin. The spacetime metric acts on every point of the worldline of each twin to produce a number, integrate that number along the worldline (there's a minus sign and square root somewhere, but that's a technicality), and you will get the age. This always works if the spacetime is classical and "given" by god as a background spacetime.
 
What i am saying is since both Earth and the ship can be considered to be traveling at near the speed of light, won't the ship see Earth as older then itself, and Earth see the ship as older then itself? In this case, what happens?
 
Natman3400 said:
What i am saying is since both Earth and the ship can be considered to be traveling at near the speed of light, won't the ship see Earth as older then itself, and Earth see the ship as older then itself? In this case, what happens?

It has nothing to do with traveling near the speed of light. Travelling near the speed of light is frame-dependent, so it's "coordinate" time dilation, not real aging. The twin paradox is about real aging.
 
atyy said:
It has nothing to do with traveling near the speed of light. Travelling near the speed of light is frame-dependent, so it's "coordinate" time dilation, not real aging. The twin paradox is about real aging.
Mind explaining abit?
 
The motion of a classical particle is described by a curve in spacetime. In situations like the twin paradox, we don't care about the small differences between the motions of different component parts of the same object, so we treat all clocks, humans, spaceships etc., as particles. The motion of each object is then approximately described by a curve in spacetime.

One of the axioms of both SR and GR is that a clock measures the proper time of the curve that represents its motion. The twin paradox is just a scenario where two objects move as described by two different curves with the same endpoints. The standard twin paradox considers two curves in Minkowski spacetime, but if you want to consider another spacetime, that's fine. There is however no spacetime in which two objects are brought together without movement. No matter what coordinate system you're using, one of the objects is moving.

If one of the two twins leaves Earth the usual way, and returns through a wormhole, the curve that describes his motion can have a longer or shorter proper time than it would have had otherwise. Either way, you find that guy's final age by calculating the proper time of the curve that represents his motion.
 
Natman3400 said:
since both Earth and the ship can be considered ...
The situation is not symmetric since the spacetime metric is asymmetric.
 
The problem is with your requirement for a magical instantaneous return trip.
And no, the problem is not in the "magical" part - we can easily close our eyes and ignore the fact that it can't exist. It is in the "instantaneous" part.

Instantaneous is just not well-defined. Once the traveling twin decides to return, there exist numerous different frames of reference, according to each of which a different point from the other twin's timeline is simultaneous with the traveler's "now". Which one will your magic chose? You can make an arbitrary pick and you will have some arbitrary answer to the question about their ages, but you can't expect us to give you a scientific argument for picking a "correct" one... it is just not well defined.
 
I kind of sounds like a proposed mode of time travel done by traveling close to the speed of light near a large gravitational field. The twin that did the sling shot would be younger, but would somehow end up traveling back in time when he arrived at Earth.

Another one was if you could move an end of a wormhole near the speed of light then one end off it would have its time slow, so then you could travel through one end and arrive in another time comeing out of the other. Then if you brought them both together you would end up comeing out of the wormhole before you went in, but then what if you stopped yourself from going in after you had went through the wormhole already?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K