Varying determinant of a metric

  • Thread starter Thread starter pleasehelpmeno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Metric
pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi does anyone know how to calculate:

\delta (det|g_{\mu\nu}|) or simply \delta g
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or equivalently,

δg = g gμν δgμν
 
You should get δg=ggμνδ(gμν)
Actually I believe this answer has a sign error, and does not correspond to what I wrote, since δgμν = - gμα gνβ δgαβ.

A quick way to check the sign is to consider a special case, gμν = λ ημν under the variation δλ. For this case,

gμν = λ-1 ημν and g = -λ4, so δgμν = ημν δλ and δg = -4 λ3 δλ.

The minus sign agrees with the expression I gave, namely g gμν δgμν = (-λ4)(λ-1ημν)(ημν δλ).

However the other expression g gμν δ(gμν) = (-λ4)(λ ημν)(-λ-2) (ημν δλ) comes out positive, which is incorrect.
 
Bill_K said:
Actually I believe this answer has a sign error, and does not correspond to what I wrote, since δgμν = - gμα gνβ δgαβ.

A quick way to check the sign is to consider a special case, gμν = λ ημν under the variation δλ. For this case,

gμν = λ-1 ημν and g = -λ4, so δgμν = ημν δλ and δg = -4 λ3 δλ.

The minus sign agrees with the expression I gave, namely g gμν δgμν = (-λ4)(λ-1ημν)(ημν δλ).

However the other expression g gμν δ(gμν) = (-λ4)(λ ημν)(-λ-2) (ημν δλ) comes out positive, which is incorrect.

You're right. Thanks for the correction.
 
yeah thanks i knew the answer but had absolutely no idea how to get it, I end up with g^{\nu\rho}g_{p\mu}\delta g^{\mu p}=-g^{\nu\rho}g^{\mu p} \delta g_{p\mu} and am not sure how to proceed from here, there is clearly relabelling but I am still a bit stuck.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top