Vector calculus in higher dimensions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the extension of vector calculus concepts, such as curl and divergence, into higher dimensions, specifically four-dimensional space. Participants explore the nature of differential operators in this context and seek to understand how traditional theorems like Stokes's theorem apply in four dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that in 4D, curl may not exist due to the absence of a cross product, proposing alternative operators related to Stokes's theorem.
  • Another participant introduces the calculus of differential forms as a generalization of vector calculus, where curl, div, and grad are special cases of the exterior derivative.
  • There is a question about whether the sequence of differential operators remains consistent in higher dimensions or if they split differently, drawing an analogy to the behavior of div and curl in 2D versus 3D.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between the exterior derivative and various forms, noting that it acts on p-forms to produce (p+1)-forms.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for specific formulas for 4D integral theorems and vector calculus operations, expressing frustration over repeated requests for clarification.
  • Another participant proposes integral calculus formulas for arc length and surface area in four dimensions, indicating an exploration of geometric interpretations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of curl and divergence in four dimensions, with no consensus reached on the specific forms or operators that would apply. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of 4D vector calculus operations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions and assumptions surrounding higher-dimensional calculus, and participants have not fully resolved the mathematical steps or the applicability of known theorems in this context.

lolgarithms
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
in 2d, "curl"(grad(f)) = 0 "curl" is the operation that green's tehorem talks about.

In 3D, curl(grad(f)) = 0 and div(curl(F)) = 0.

We may consider vector calculus in 4 spatial dimensions, for vector fields F:R^4 -> R^4. what is "curl" like in 4D, since curl is actually only difined in 3D. I think there would be no curl in 4D because there's no cross product in 4D. instead there would be 2 operators related by Stokes's theorem for general manifolds.
my conjecture is that in 4 dimensions, some other operator D2 exists such that div(D2(F)) = 0. Also there exists another operator D1 such that D2(D1(f)) = 0 and D1(gradient(f))=0. Div would still be from an operator from a vector field to a scalar field.
the divergence theorem would be relating 4-volumes to 3-volumes(boundary of 4-volume)

Do they exist? what is the nature of such an operator (in cartesian) and how can i visualize it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The generalization of vector calculus to general higher dimensional manifolds is the calculus of differential forms. Curl, div, grad all become special cases of a single operator called the 'exterior derivative' d.
 
yes, all differential operators are special cases of exterior derivative, but in 4 or higher dimensions would they still take the general sequence of gradient:{f: R^4 -> R} -> {f:R^4 -> R^4}, ... then some other differentail operators ..., then divergence: {f:R^4 -> R^4} -> {f:R^4 -> R} ? or would some of the operators split in a different way? (an analogy for lower dimensions is how div and curl are actually the same in 2D, but they become different operators in 3D.)
 
lolgarithms said:
yes, all differential operators are special cases of exterior derivative, but in 4 or higher dimensions would they still take the general sequence of gradient:{f: R^4 -> R} -> {f:R^4 -> R^4}, ... then some other differentail operators ..., then divergence: {f:R^4 -> R^4} -> {f:R^4 -> R} ? or would some of the operators split in a different way?

d acting on a function (which gives a 1-form) is the analog of gradient, d acting on a 1-form (which gives a 2-form) is the analog of curl and d acting on a 2-form (which gives a 3-form) is the analog of divergence.

In general, d takes a p-form to a (p+1)-form.

lolgarithms said:
(an analogy for lower dimensions is how div and curl are actually the same in 2D, but they become different operators in 3D.)

div and curl are not the same in 2D.
 
Last edited:
oh, i meant that both div and curl can be described by green's theorem in 2D:
div:
\int_C -M \,dx + L\, dy = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial M}{\partial y}\right)\, dA = \iint_D\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\right)dA

curl:
\int_{C} L\, dx + M\, dy = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right)\, dA = \iint_D |\nabla\times\mathbf{F}| dA
 
Last edited:
Green's theorem involves the curl. I'm not sure what you mean by "both div and curl can be described by green's theorem". All the integral theorems of vector calculus are special cases of the general stokes theorem

\int_{\Omega} d\omega = \oint_{\partial \Omega} \omega
 
Last edited:
im being a little sloppy here... you rotate L and M (L,M) -> (-M,L) so that the tangent vectors become normal to the boundary, so that (L dx+ M dy) -> (-M dx + L dy). plug -M into L, and plug L into M, into the green's tehorem, and you will get the theorem for 2D divergence.
we got wrapped up in (metaphorical) tangents, now could you answer my question


a little clarification on opening post:
in 1D there is only one integral theorem, the fundamental theorem of calculus. (special case of line integral theorem)
in 2D there are the line integral theorem and Green's theorem
in 3D there are the line integral theorem and the kelvin-stokes (curl) theorem and gauss's divergence theorem
in 4D: line integral theorem (true for all dimensions) and ?

do not tell me that they are special cases of stokes's theorem. i already know that, thank you very much. i want the specific formulas for the 4D integral theorems and the 4 dimensional vector calculus operations corresponding to them.
template:
"fundamental theorem of calculus(derivative): \int _a ^b f'(x) dx = f(b)-f(a)
 
Last edited:
in 4D: line integral theorem (true for all dimensions) and ?

do not tell me that they are special cases of stokes's theorem. i already know that, thank you very much. i want the specific formulas for the 4D integral theorems and the 4 dimensional vector calculus operations corresponding to them.

do I really have to repeat myself to be heard??

I should have titled this "vector calculus in 4D"
 
Hmmmm... I thought about it for a while and came up with some integral calculus formulas for arc length, surface area, hyperarea, etc
∭_R▒〖√(1+〖(∂t/∂x)〗^█(2@) 〖+(∂t/∂z)〗^2+(∂t/∂y)^2 ) dV〗
That is sa in 4 dimensions
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K