Vector multiplication question

Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
I'm not sure where to put this question, since it deals with both physics and math, so I figured here would be a good starting point.

In the book of astrodynamics I'm currently reading, I came across this expansion:

(\vec{r}\times\vec{v})\times\vec{r}=[\vec{v}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{r})-\vec{r}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{v})]

Can anyone explain how this result is arrived at? If any physical significance is needed, r is a position vector and v its derivative with respect to time, the velocity vector.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, the standard way is just to use the vector triple product (Lagranges formula, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_product#Vector_triple_product"):

\vec{a}\times (\vec{b}\times \vec{c})= \vec{b}(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{c}) - \vec c (\vec a\cdot \vec b)
(also know as the BAC CAB rule)

This relation can easily be proved, by calculating both sides (just insert \vec {a} = (a_1,a_2,a_3) and so on).

In your case we have, \vec a = \vec c \equiv \vec r and \vec b \equiv \dot{\vec r} = \vec v.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, thank you very much :) Simply a formula I was not familiar with.
 
? The "triple product" is just the same as the product asked about so I don't see how that answers your question, except to say "yes, it is a well known calculation". Of course, the way to see that it is true is to use some general <a, b, c>, <x, y, z> for \vec{r} and \vec{v}.

For a little more "intuitive" insight, we know that \vec{r}\times\vec{v} is perpendicular to both \vec{r} and \vec{v} so the result of any vector cross \vec{r}\times\vec{v} must be perpendicular to that vector and so in the plane spanned by \vec{r} and \vec{v} and can be written as a linear combination of them: a\vec{r}+ b\vec{v}. But (\vec{r}\times\vec{v})\times \vec{r} must also be perpendicular to \vec{r} so we must subtract off any projection onto \vec{r}. That is the "\vec{r}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{v}" part.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top