Vector notation. just an explanation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of vector notation, specifically the use of unit vectors \(\hat{i}\) and \(\hat{j}\) in the context of vector problems. Participants are exploring the meaning of these notations in relation to Cartesian coordinates and their application in physics problems involving motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the meaning of unit vectors \(\hat{i}\) and \(\hat{j}\), discussing their roles as orthogonal components in a vector. Some express confusion about how to apply these concepts in calculations involving motion, while others question the implications of using these notations in different contexts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants sharing their understanding and interpretations of vector notation. Some have provided explanations regarding the definitions and uses of unit vectors, while others are still grappling with the concepts and seeking further clarification. There is a mix of insights and questions, indicating a collaborative effort to deepen understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific applications involving time, displacement, and velocity, indicating that the discussion is situated within a physics homework context. There are references to the need for clarity on the mathematical operations involving these vectors, as well as the potential for confusion in their application.

Jbright1406
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
i don't have a problem just a little confusion. what exactly does the i hat and j hat notation mean when given a vector problem.

such as \vec{}a= 0.023 \hat{}im/s^{}2 + 0.046 \hat{}jm/s^{}2

what is this statement actually saying. i know what i need to do with it, but don't quite grasp what this statement means


thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jbright1406 said:
i don't have a problem just a little confusion. what exactly does the i hat and j hat notation mean when given a vector problem.

such as \vec{}a= 0.023 \hat{}im/s^{}2 + 0.046 \hat{}jm/s^{}2

what is this statement actually saying. i know what i need to do with it, but don't quite grasp what this statement means


thanks
\hat{i} and \hat{j} are orthogonal unit vectors, the former is parallel to the x-axis and the latter is parallel to the y-axis. Explicitly, in Cartesian coordinates \hat{i} = \left(1,0\right) and \hat{j} = \left(0,1\right).

Does that make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
It is convenient (it make the math easier) to be able to express a vector in terms of components which related to the coordinate system in use. For the Cartesian coordinate system, we write vectors in terms of components which are parallel to the coordinate axes (x,y,z). i hat is by definition a unit vector (magnitude 1 unit) parallel to the x axis. We use a unit vector because we can construct the x component of any vector by multiplying i hat by the magnitude of the x component of the vector.

The same is true for j hat and (when necessary) k hat, except that they are parallel to the y and z axes, repspectively.
 
so basically x and y. what exactly is meant by the unit vector. i think i get the it means it has a magnitude of one unit. but you lost me on the mulipltying them. I am using them deal with time, displacement initial and final velocity. I have the questions answered as i had someone try to explain it a little last night. so i have the answer to what we want but not sure how we arrived at it.

bc the initial velocity is 3.8 \hat{}ithe velocity after ten seconds is 4.08 m/s\hat{}i+ .46 m/s \hat{}j
 
Jbright1406 said:
isuch as \vec{}a= 0.023 \hat{}im/s^{}2 + 0.046 \hat{}jm/s^{}2


ok here is what i know

i-hat = going to the right
j-hat= going up
k-hat= is mostly used as hypotenuse which is usulay find by using Pythagorean equation.

so (i-hat)^2 + (j-hat)^2 = (k-hat)^2
 
so if I am looking at it just in a generic way, that is just the length of the line/ magnitude if its a vector
 
kmikias said:
k-hat= is mostly used as hypotenuse (or somethimes it could be magnitude of i-hat and j-hat) which is usulay find by using Pythagorean equation.

so (i-hat)^2 + (j-hat)^2 = (k-hat)^2
This is an extremely unorthodox use of notation and I have never seen it used.

As I said in my previous post \hat{i}, \hat{j} and \hat{k} are mutually orthogonal (i.e. all perpendicular to each other) unit vectors. \hat{i} is parallel to the x-axis, \hat{j} is parallel to the y-axis and \hat{k} is parallel to the z-axis.
 
yes... it just all about two dimensional motion.the only thing is you have to remember the vertical and horizontal components are separated.using i-hat and j-hat.i think they call this independent of vertical and horizontal motion.
 
damn, i know this stuff should be easy, i think I am thinking about it way to hard and confusing myself.
 
  • #10
Hootenanny said:
This is an extremely unorthodox use of notation and I have never seen it used.

.

ok then late say you have i-hat and j-hat and the question asked you to find k hat which is a magnitude ...how do you gone find and what formula you gone use.
 
  • #11
Jbright1406 said:
damn, i know this stuff should be easy, i think I am thinking about it way to hard and confusing myself.
The easiest way I can put it is this. The unit vector gives the direction and the scalar coefficient gives the magnitude. For example, suppose we have a vector:

\bold{v} = 2\hat{i} + 3\hat{j}

This means that to draw the vector (v) you would move 2 units along the x-axis and 3 units up the y-axis.
 
  • #12
kmikias said:
ok then late say you have i-hat and j-hat and the question asked you to find k hat which is a magnitude ...how do you gone find and what formula you gone use.
The point is the question wouldn't ask that because the standard definition of k-hat is for the unit vector parallel to the z-axis. k-hat is already in standard use and so wouldn't be used for such a quantity.
 
  • #13
sorry this is such a big picture, but this is what i have to work with.

j5wm7p.jpg

mkzojt.jpg

ngpobs.jpg
 
  • #14
Hootenanny said:
\bold{v} = 2\hat{i} + 3\hat{j}

This means that to draw the vector (v) you would move 2 units along the x-axis and 3 units up the y-axis.

I will agree on that .
 
  • #15
Jbright1406: So I'm guessing that your having trouble with part (c). Could you post your working?
 
  • #16
im at the library an ddont have it on the comp. I am tryin to work it on paper but i think I am plugging it it wrong.
try this
(.23*10+.5*.023*10^2)ihat + (0.46*10+.5*.046*10^2)jhat
3.45 i hat + 6.9 jhat
 
  • #17
Jbright1406 said:
im at the library an ddont have it on the comp. I am tryin to work it on paper but i think I am plugging it it wrong.
try this
(.23*10+.5*.023*10^2)ihat + (0.46*10+.5*.046*10^2)jhat
3.45 i hat + 6.9 jhat
I'm note sure where your pulling those numbers from, but note that the values in red should be the initial velocity of the boat before the acceleration.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K