Mr Davis 97
- 1,461
- 44
Say that I have two vectors that define a plane. How do I show that a third vector is perpendicular to this plane? Do I use the cross product somehow?
The discussion revolves around determining how to show that a vector is perpendicular to a plane defined by two other vectors. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including the use of the dot product and the cross product, and engage in a specific problem involving vector calculations.
Participants express differing views on the best method to demonstrate perpendicularity, with some favoring the cross product and others the dot product. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective approach.
Participants note potential mistakes in calculations, particularly in the cross product, but do not resolve these issues. There is also mention of preferences in vector notation, which may influence clarity in communication.
I don't see how the dot product would be used... To me, it would make sense to use it when we only need to show that one vector is perpendicular to another. But here we need to show that one vector is perpendicular to a plane (that two other vectors create).jedishrfu said:What about using the dot product?
Not how I would do it.Mr Davis 97 said:Okay, so I am specifically asking this in relation to a specific problem:
Given the vector ##\vec{A} = 3\hat{i} + 4\hat{j} -4\hat{k}##,
(1) find a unit vector ##\hat{B}## that lies in the x-y plane and is perpendicular to \vec{A}.
First, we note that ##\hat{B} = B_x \hat{i} + B_y \hat{j}##, and that ##B_x^2 + B_Y^2 = 1## since ##\hat{B}## is a unit vector. Solving this system simultaneously comes up with the solution ##\displaystyle B_x = \frac{4}{5}, B_y = -\frac{3}{5}##
Yes it would, and this is something you should do, because you have a mistake, most likely in your cross product.Mr Davis 97 said:(2) find a unit vector ##\hat{C}## that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}##.
the unit vector that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}## is ##\displaystyle \hat{C} = \pm \frac{\vec{A} \times \hat{B}}{| \vec{A} \times \hat{B} |}##. After lots of calculations, we find that ##\displaystyle \hat{c} = \frac{-12 \hat{i} - 16 \hat{j} + 7 \hat{k}}{\sqrt{449}}##
(3) show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane defined by ##\hat{B}## and ##\hat{C}##
So would showing that ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{B} = 0## and ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{C} = 0## be sufficient to show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane?