1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Vectors and Interpretation in Physics Calculations

  1. Apr 11, 2010 #1

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Hello;

    I have never really come across vectors before in physics, so could someone help me out? For example, what would be an example question and a calculation involving this;

    [tex]\phi_m = \int \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{A}[/tex]

    Correct me if I'm wrong but is this saying that the magnetic flux is equal to the integral of the magnetic field multiplied by the area?

    How do you indicate what direction you're using in your calculations? Is it simply if it is a positive or negative value, meaning one direction or the opposite direction?

    Also, what are magnetic flux, magnetic field and area measured in? What exactly is "area" referring to?

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 11, 2010 #2
    Your statement is surprising. Have you not studied dynamics where you can find velocity, acceleration, force and so on as vectors?
    It's not an arithmetic multiplication. It's a vector multiplication. In this case we call it dot product. And the integration is a closed surface integral not a line integration. Are you familiar with double integrals? Also the scalar notion of area here is vectorized as area vector.
    So you have to read as the magnetic flux is equal to the surface integral of dot product of the magnetic field and the area vector.
    No, it's not so simple like positive or negative value indicating directions. The direction is taken from the problem that you are going to solve. So no specific direction for all problems.
    magnetic flux is measured in weber, magnetic field in tesla and area in meter squared.
    Yeah, the vector notion of area appears to be tantalizing to those at first who were exposed to vectors less. Let me make it easy for you. Area gives us a two dimensional space. Just imagine a rectangular plane. Like your physics textbook. Anyway your book may be thick. But forget its thickness for the time being. Now your book has two sides -front cover and back cover. Both the areas of front and back cover is same. So, if I tell you only the amount of area, you can't say about which side of the book I'm referring to. This problem can be solved if I introduce a vector perpendicular to the both covers of your book. Just put a pen perpendicularly on any side of your book. Then that pen is the area vector for that side of the book. It is directed upward and perpendicular to the surface of an area i.e. book cover. Now, each side of your book will have two different area vectors. They are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. So, with the help of an area vector we can indicate which side of a plane we are dealing with.
    Hope this helps.
     
  4. Apr 11, 2010 #3

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    I concur with tensorbundle. You've never solved a projectile motion or inclined plane problems? That would be very odd.

    Zz.
     
  5. Apr 11, 2010 #4

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Hello;

    Yes, but not as vectors, strangely.

    I've heard of those. Can you explain to me how they are calculated? i.e. finding the dot product of two vectors. I remember watching a video that explained it okay-ish, but now I've forgotten.

    I know how to calculate them -- but never graphically seen what they look like. What is a closed surface integral?

    Is that what the "dA" means? Thanks. Also, how do we denote the direction of a vector?

    Okay, I get it. Thanks.

    So how is direction denoted?

    Gotcha. Cheers.

    This helps very much indeed. Thank you!
     
  6. Apr 11, 2010 #5
    http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/LinAlg/Vectors.aspx

    You should take a course in Linear Algebra.
     
  7. Apr 11, 2010 #6
    Hi FeDeX_LaTeX,
    After reading your response I was obliged to check your profile to get some idea about your mathematical education. I came to know that you don't like math but like physics very much and you are doing GCSE.
    Well, from some of your threads I saw you are talking about Riemann zeta function, hyperbolic geometry but you do not know about surface integral. You reminded me the young mathematician of versatile genius Ramanujan who didn't have idea about complex numbers but formulated sophisticated theorems of number theory which were far ahead of his own time mathematics.
    Some of your posts were related quarks,w/Z bosons, dark matter but you do not know how to calculate dot product of two vectors. That's just unimaginable.
    Probably your dislike toward mathematics has caused this situation. In fact you may know many things about physics but your mathematics is really poor.
    If you really like physics, love mathematics. Every theoretical physicists have to become a pure mathematician in some way of their researches. That's inevitable. Read the biographies of your famous physicists. You will know how much they used to love math.
    And regarding vector dot product, you can find the topic vector algebra in any elementary math or physics book. Read math books with positive mindsets. Don't hate math.
    I also used to hate math till my 11th grade. Specially when I had to solve trigonometric identities, my hatred used to increase. In the same year I was learning analytic geometry. I liked the way of representing geometric entities in term of algebraic equations. This changed my mindsets. Since then I became staunch lover of math. Now when I pick up the pen to do math and start to write the symbols, I feel divine happiness. I can't express how much I love math. Perhaps, former hatred has deepened the love.
     
  8. Apr 11, 2010 #7

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Hello;

    Thank you for the reply and for your story. My hatred for mathematics I think may have stemmed from the boredom that is the GCSE course... I absolutely adored mathematics for what it was prior to my fifteenth birthday, and I even began to do research of my own, looking at the distribution of prime numbers for days. But when my GCSE year started, everything seemed so wrapped up in tedium and dullness that my mathematical obsessions seemed to shrivel and my love for physics came about out of nowhere -- I dreaded physics before, yet now I adore it more for what it is. It's as if the two switched. I aim to seek the balance to love the two in future... such is my ambition. I did devote a lot of my time to educating and honing my ability in mathematics, but the very terrible consequence of doing this was that I tried to learn things that I perhaps shouldn't have; I learned things about calculus and several parts of the A-Level modules four years before I would actually be taking them, and only now have I realised that it was utterly pointless, since my desire to take the modules earlier was not actually possible due to my school's limitations. I recall reading an entire copy of Heinemann's Decision Mathematics (D1-D2) just before I came to hate mathematics.

    As you might imagine, as a very young, inquisitive and rather... stupid individual, I do look up to you, and anyone who posts on this forum with such a high degree of intelligence that I one day hope to possess myself.

    Since we're leaning off on a tangent here, thank you for the advice regarding the dot product -- I will find out about it, definitely.

    Thanks.
     
  9. Apr 11, 2010 #8

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I have one question, is the dot product the same as the cross product? I am reading about it now.
     
  10. Apr 11, 2010 #9

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    You can try Hyperphysics:

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/vect.html#veccon

    But it sounds like what you really need is a calculus-based introductory university physics textbook like Halliday/Resnick/Walker or Tipler/Mosca. There are several other common textbooks at that level, at least in the USA. I don't know what's used in the UK where you are, if I remember correctly.

    For magnetic flux, again try Hyperphysics, or better, a textbook like the above.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/fluxmg.html
     
  11. Apr 11, 2010 #10
    I see you didn't bother with the link so let me try again.

    Dot Product


    http://tinyurl.com/ybs8fae"
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  12. Apr 11, 2010 #11

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I didn't find anything about the cross product or dot product in the link you gave me in the post, which is why I'm asking... unless I missed it.
     
  13. Apr 11, 2010 #12
    http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/LinAlg/Dot_CrossProduct.aspx
    It is the second part of the section on vectors.
    The answer is no the dot and cross product are different things and have different applications.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Vectors and Interpretation in Physics Calculations
Loading...