Vectors- gradient and normal unit vector- is this correct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the gradient and normal unit vector for the scalar field f(x, y, z) = x² - y² - z at the point (1, 1, 0). The gradient is correctly calculated as grad f = 2i - 2j - k, which indicates the direction of steepest ascent. However, the normal unit vector was initially miscalculated; the correct unit normal vector is derived from the gradient vector normalized by its magnitude, resulting in grad(f)/|grad(f)|. The participants confirm that the gradient vector is normal to the tangent plane of the surface defined by f(x, y, z) = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scalar fields and their gradients
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically normal and tangent vectors
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and vector normalization
  • Basic concepts of partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about vector normalization techniques in vector calculus
  • Study the properties of gradients in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the relationship between gradients and tangent planes
  • Investigate the applications of normal vectors in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with multivariable functions and need to understand gradients and normal vectors in their applications.

tomanator
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the scalar field f(x, y, z) = x2 − y2 − z find gradf and normal unit
vector to a surface f(x, y, z) = 0 at the point (1, 1, 0).

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated gradf= 2xi -2yj -k

at (1,1,0) this is = 2i -2y -k

normal unit vector= \frac{2i -2y -k}{\sqrt{9}}

normal unit vector = \frac{1}{3}(2i -2y -k)

is this correct it seems too simple in terms of marks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've calculated the gradient correctly, but not the normal unit vector. The gradient is tangent to the surface in the direction where the slope is maximum. The normal vector is perpendicular to the tangent plane of the surface. So the normal unit vector will be perpendicular to the gradient vector. You have just calculated the unit gradient vector.
 
phyzguy said:
I think you've calculated the gradient correctly, but not the normal unit vector. The gradient is tangent to the surface in the direction where the slope is maximum. The normal vector is perpendicular to the tangent plane of the surface. So the normal unit vector will be perpendicular to the gradient vector. You have just calculated the unit gradient vector.

Thanks for you reply, so do you know how I calculate the normal unit vector then?
 
Tomanator,
your solution is correct. The gradient in a point of a f(x,y,z)=constant surface is normal to the tangent plane of this surface at the given point.

A small change of f can be written as dF=grad f˙dr, the dot product of the gradf vector with the displacement vector dr. You get the highest change of f if the displacement is parallel to the gradient: the gradient vector points in the direction of the steepest slope of the f function.
If dr is tangent to an f(x,y,z) = constant surface dF=grad f˙dr=0. A dot product of two non-zero vector is 0 if they are perpendicular: gradf and dr are perpendicular, gradf is normal vector to the tangent plane.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Tomanator,
your solution is correct. The gradient in a point of a f(x,y,z)=constant surface is normal to the tangent plane of this surface at the given point.

A small change of f can be written as dF=grad f˙dr, the dot product of the gradf vector with the displacement vector dr. You get the highest change of f if the displacement is parallel to the gradient: the gradient vector points in the direction of the steepest slope of the f function.
If dr is tangent to an f(x,y,z) = constant surface dF=grad f˙dr=0. A dot product of two non-zero vector is 0 if they are perpendicular: gradf and dr are perpendicular, gradf is normal vector to the tangent plane.

ehild

Ok thanks ehild, I'm glad I did it correct first time. I have an exam next week so it's promising :)
 
but what if dr is not the tangent to the surface ?? how do u calculate the unit normal vector then ?
 
The gradient vector is normal to the surfaces f(x,y,z)=constant, and it can be determined from the partial derivatives of f(x,y,z). You do not need any dr to determine it. What I explained was that the gradient vector is really normal to the f=constant surfaces. And you get the change df of the function f when moving from r to r+dr by calculating the dot product grad(f )˙dr=df.

ehild
 
yes, i get it .. i always keep forgetting dr is the tangent to the plane of surface. thanks ehild. could you help with what a unit normal vector is ?? is it the direction of the gradient vector? if so, how do you calculate it given the gradient and a point on the surface ?
 
tomanator said:

Homework Statement



For the scalar field f(x, y, z) = x2 − y2 − z find gradf and normal unit
vector to a surface f(x, y, z) = 0 at the point (1, 1, 0).

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated gradf= 2xi -2yj -k

at (1,1,0) this is = 2i -2y -k

normal unit vector= \frac{2i -2y -k}{\sqrt{9}}

normal unit vector = \frac{1}{3}(2i -2y -k)

is this correct it seems too simple in terms of marks

Your calculations are correct: grad f is the direction of steepest ascent (i.e., the direction of greatest rate of increase in f), and grad(f)/|grad(f)| is the corresponding unit normal.

RGV
 
  • #10
msslowlearner said:
yes, i get it .. i always keep forgetting dr is the tangent to the plane of surface. thanks ehild. could you help with what a unit normal vector is ?? is it the direction of the gradient vector? if so, how do you calculate it given the gradient and a point on the surface ?

See the original post.


ehild
 
  • #11
Ray Vickson said:
Your calculations are correct: grad f is the direction of steepest ascent (i.e., the direction of greatest rate of increase in f), and grad(f)/|grad(f)| is the corresponding unit normal.

RGV

Hi RGV,
It was not "tomanator"who asked about finding the normal vector now, but "msslowlearner". "tomanator" solved the problem in the OP, but "msslowlearner" did not look at his solution in the post more than one year ago.

ehild
 
  • #12
yes.., I'm new to the physicsforums .. hardly a week here .. :)
 
  • #13
Hi

I am trying to learn about covariant and contravariant vectors and derivatives. The videos I have been watching talk about displacement vector as the basis for contravariant vectors and gradient as the basis for covariant vectors. Can someone tlel me the difference between displacemement and gradient vectors?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K