Vectors- gradient and normal unit vector- is this correct?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gradient and normal unit vector for the scalar field f(x, y, z) = x² - y² - z at the point (1, 1, 0). Participants are examining the relationship between the gradient and the normal vector to a surface defined by f(x, y, z) = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the gradient and its interpretation as a direction of steepest ascent. There is confusion regarding the calculation of the normal unit vector, with some questioning whether the gradient itself serves as the normal vector.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the correctness of the gradient calculation while expressing uncertainty about the normal unit vector. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the gradient and the normal vector, with various interpretations being discussed. Guidance has been offered regarding the properties of the gradient in relation to the tangent plane.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the definitions of gradient and normal vectors, as well as the implications of their calculations. There is mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the tangent vector and its relationship to the surface.

tomanator
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the scalar field f(x, y, z) = x2 − y2 − z find gradf and normal unit
vector to a surface f(x, y, z) = 0 at the point (1, 1, 0).

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated gradf= 2xi -2yj -k

at (1,1,0) this is = 2i -2y -k

normal unit vector= \frac{2i -2y -k}{\sqrt{9}}

normal unit vector = \frac{1}{3}(2i -2y -k)

is this correct it seems too simple in terms of marks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've calculated the gradient correctly, but not the normal unit vector. The gradient is tangent to the surface in the direction where the slope is maximum. The normal vector is perpendicular to the tangent plane of the surface. So the normal unit vector will be perpendicular to the gradient vector. You have just calculated the unit gradient vector.
 
phyzguy said:
I think you've calculated the gradient correctly, but not the normal unit vector. The gradient is tangent to the surface in the direction where the slope is maximum. The normal vector is perpendicular to the tangent plane of the surface. So the normal unit vector will be perpendicular to the gradient vector. You have just calculated the unit gradient vector.

Thanks for you reply, so do you know how I calculate the normal unit vector then?
 
Tomanator,
your solution is correct. The gradient in a point of a f(x,y,z)=constant surface is normal to the tangent plane of this surface at the given point.

A small change of f can be written as dF=grad f˙dr, the dot product of the gradf vector with the displacement vector dr. You get the highest change of f if the displacement is parallel to the gradient: the gradient vector points in the direction of the steepest slope of the f function.
If dr is tangent to an f(x,y,z) = constant surface dF=grad f˙dr=0. A dot product of two non-zero vector is 0 if they are perpendicular: gradf and dr are perpendicular, gradf is normal vector to the tangent plane.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Tomanator,
your solution is correct. The gradient in a point of a f(x,y,z)=constant surface is normal to the tangent plane of this surface at the given point.

A small change of f can be written as dF=grad f˙dr, the dot product of the gradf vector with the displacement vector dr. You get the highest change of f if the displacement is parallel to the gradient: the gradient vector points in the direction of the steepest slope of the f function.
If dr is tangent to an f(x,y,z) = constant surface dF=grad f˙dr=0. A dot product of two non-zero vector is 0 if they are perpendicular: gradf and dr are perpendicular, gradf is normal vector to the tangent plane.

ehild

Ok thanks ehild, I'm glad I did it correct first time. I have an exam next week so it's promising :)
 
but what if dr is not the tangent to the surface ?? how do u calculate the unit normal vector then ?
 
The gradient vector is normal to the surfaces f(x,y,z)=constant, and it can be determined from the partial derivatives of f(x,y,z). You do not need any dr to determine it. What I explained was that the gradient vector is really normal to the f=constant surfaces. And you get the change df of the function f when moving from r to r+dr by calculating the dot product grad(f )˙dr=df.

ehild
 
yes, i get it .. i always keep forgetting dr is the tangent to the plane of surface. thanks ehild. could you help with what a unit normal vector is ?? is it the direction of the gradient vector? if so, how do you calculate it given the gradient and a point on the surface ?
 
tomanator said:

Homework Statement



For the scalar field f(x, y, z) = x2 − y2 − z find gradf and normal unit
vector to a surface f(x, y, z) = 0 at the point (1, 1, 0).

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated gradf= 2xi -2yj -k

at (1,1,0) this is = 2i -2y -k

normal unit vector= \frac{2i -2y -k}{\sqrt{9}}

normal unit vector = \frac{1}{3}(2i -2y -k)

is this correct it seems too simple in terms of marks

Your calculations are correct: grad f is the direction of steepest ascent (i.e., the direction of greatest rate of increase in f), and grad(f)/|grad(f)| is the corresponding unit normal.

RGV
 
  • #10
msslowlearner said:
yes, i get it .. i always keep forgetting dr is the tangent to the plane of surface. thanks ehild. could you help with what a unit normal vector is ?? is it the direction of the gradient vector? if so, how do you calculate it given the gradient and a point on the surface ?

See the original post.


ehild
 
  • #11
Ray Vickson said:
Your calculations are correct: grad f is the direction of steepest ascent (i.e., the direction of greatest rate of increase in f), and grad(f)/|grad(f)| is the corresponding unit normal.

RGV

Hi RGV,
It was not "tomanator"who asked about finding the normal vector now, but "msslowlearner". "tomanator" solved the problem in the OP, but "msslowlearner" did not look at his solution in the post more than one year ago.

ehild
 
  • #12
yes.., I'm new to the physicsforums .. hardly a week here .. :)
 
  • #13
Hi

I am trying to learn about covariant and contravariant vectors and derivatives. The videos I have been watching talk about displacement vector as the basis for contravariant vectors and gradient as the basis for covariant vectors. Can someone tlel me the difference between displacemement and gradient vectors?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K