B Vectors & Gradients: Confused? Get Answers Now!

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hayden Herzberger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding the explanation of vectors in Einstein's field equations, particularly the terms dx and dø. The original poster struggles to understand how these terms are classified as vectors and why dø changes to dy. There is a sentiment that content labeled as "for beginners" may not adequately cater to those without a calculus background. Some participants express frustration over perceived unwelcoming attitudes towards newcomers seeking help. The conversation emphasizes the need for clear explanations and supportive dialogue in educational forums.
Hayden Herzberger
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I was watching a video explaining Einsteins field equations for beginners and he was giving some information on Vectors before he gets into the actual equations. He got to this equation:

I'm real confused, how does he know that dx and dø are both? Why does dø change to dy? What does the equation even mean? Please help I can't continue the video because I'm real confused on his part.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    19.9 KB · Views: 489
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Perhaps for beginners doesn't mean for people who have not yet studied calculus?
 
Hayden Herzberger said:
I was watching a video explaining Einsteins field equations for beginners and he was giving some information on Vectors before he gets into the actual equations. He got to this equation:

I'm real confused, how did he figure that dx and dø are both vectors but the other things are not?
DrSteve said:
Perhaps for beginners doesn't mean for people who have not yet studied calculus?

Well that was rather snotty. I figured it out and it was just him not explaining it properly. A forum like this should be welcoming to beginners and not picking fun at their ignorance. If you're not helping then don't reply.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Tim Bell
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top