Vegetarian or Not? Poll & Forum Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Centaur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the dietary preferences of scientists, particularly the prevalence of vegetarianism among them. A poll was initiated to gauge the dietary habits of forum members, revealing that most identify as omnivores. Participants debated the terminology used in the poll, suggesting "omnivore" instead of "meat-eater" for clarity. Claims were made about notable scientists, like Einstein, who adopted vegetarianism later in life, but many participants expressed skepticism about the prevalence of vegetarianism in the scientific community. Humor was prevalent throughout the conversation, with jokes about cannibalism and dietary labels. Some participants shared personal experiences with vegetarianism and hunting, discussing the environmental impact of meat production, including water usage statistics. The conversation also touched on the potential of lab-grown meat as a solution to environmental concerns related to traditional meat production. Overall, the thread highlighted a mix of serious and humorous takes on dietary choices, with a focus on the implications of those choices in relation to science and the environment.

What type of diet do you mostly follow?

  • Vegetarian (inc. lacto- [dairy] or ovo- [eggs])

    Votes: 11 16.9%
  • Pescatarian (love fish)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Vegan

    Votes: 2 3.1%
  • Raw Vegan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fruitarian

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Flexitarian (I still love my meat sometimes)

    Votes: 8 12.3%
  • Meat-eater

    Votes: 41 63.1%
  • Other (please state in thread)

    Votes: 3 4.6%

  • Total voters
    65
  • #91
Evo said:
Here in the us the cattle graze and don't require much extra feed. The fields are mowed in the fall and the grass is rolled into bails of hay for feed over the winter.
Hmm... there's a geographic difference that I wasn't aware of before. Here in Alberta, the cattle are kept to graze in pastures. Simultaneously, the feed/bedding is grown in hay fields which they aren't allowed to access. (Maybe it has something to do with our shorter growing season.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
If God hadn't meant for Man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.

That's faith. If you prefer science, predators usually evolve to be smarter than prey. Prey survive by tactics of evasion and safety through numbers by keeping up high reproductive rates. Predators must rely on strength and superior intelligence if they don't have some major edge like venom or attack from the air.

Man is on top of the food chain because he evolved to eat everything and kill off all competition including his own species.

Foregoing the eating of meat is turning your back on the hard-won victories of countless ancestors stretching back into the beginning of biological time. It is turning your back on what makes us the humans we are- the instincts to kill and win.

Be a winner, not a loser. Grill a burger and enjoy every delicious bite. You ancestors deserve recognition, not rejection.
 
  • #93
Antiphon said:
If God hadn't meant for Man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat... ...You ancestors deserve recognition, not rejection.

I could not agree more, other than the fact than I'm an Atheist. I have often told people who demeaned my carnivore status that my ancestors fought for millions of years to attain the top of the food chain. I'm not about to disrespect them by eating plants.
As for your first sentence, it is not something that I could ever say but wish that I could. I put it in the same category as those who say that if god meant people to fly they would have wings. The proper response from non-Atheist pilots is that if he meant us to drive we would have 4 wheels and a carbeurator. :rolleyes:
 
  • #94
Antiphon said:
If God hadn't meant for Man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.

That's faith. If you prefer science, predators usually evolve to be smarter than prey. Prey survive by tactics of evasion and safety through numbers by keeping up high reproductive rates. Predators must rely on strength and superior intelligence if they don't have some major edge like venom or attack from the air.

Man is on top of the food chain because he evolved to eat everything and kill off all competition including his own species.

Foregoing the eating of meat is turning your back on the hard-won victories of countless ancestors stretching back into the beginning of biological time. It is turning your back on what makes us the humans we are- the instincts to kill and win.

Be a winner, not a loser. Grill a burger and enjoy every delicious bite. You ancestors deserve recognition, not rejection.

Our ancestors also wiped their arse with their hands, shat outdoors, lived in caves...
By your above logic, you should not turn your back on your ancestors positions on these things either.
 
  • #95
Antiphon said:
Grill a burger and enjoy every delicious bite. You ancestors deserve recognition, not rejection.

So will your cardiologist and internal medicine specialist... in time...just sayin!
 
  • #96
Proton Soup said:
human population growth is the biggest part of the equation. if you can bring that to a steady state, you can alleviate quite a lot of problems.

If I recall correctly (don't have a reference to cite at the moment, maybe later), population projections show us topping out at a little over 13B. I.e maybe only one more doubling to go!
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 211 ·
8
Replies
211
Views
28K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K