Centaur
- 34
- 0
There are so many claims that scientists become vegetarian, so I was wondering who on these forums are vegetarian or similar. Therefore, I made a poll...
The discussion revolves around dietary preferences, specifically the prevalence of vegetarianism among scientists and the categorization of different diets, including omnivorous and carnivorous diets. Participants engage in a poll regarding their eating habits, while also exploring humorous and serious takes on dietary labels.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the prevalence of vegetarianism among scientists, the categorization of diets, or the appropriateness of humor related to dietary choices. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the definitions and implications of various dietary labels.
Some participants express uncertainty about the accuracy of the poll options and the potential bias in the thread title, indicating that the discussion may not fully represent the diversity of dietary preferences.
All of the scientists I know are normal, they all eat meat and vegetables. I don't know where you saw any of those claims.Centaur said:There are so many claims that scientists become vegetarian, so I was wondering who on these forums are vegetarian or similar. Therefore, I made a poll...
I think that's covered by 'meat eater'.Topher925 said:Why is there no option for cannibalism?
Topher925 said:Why is there no option for cannibalism?
KalamMekhar said:What would I be considered if I eat vegetarians?
A humanitarian?KalamMekhar said:What would I be considered if I eat vegetarians?
No they become vegetables.ibnsos said:I always thought it was mainly liberal arts and art majors that become vegetarians.
Cannibalism falls under humanitarianism.Evo said:I think that's covered by 'meat eater'.
turbo-1 said:Cannibalism falls under humanitarianism.
I'm not humorless. Maine humor is pretty dry, so it doesn't hit you right away. Not well-suited to the 'web, I'm afraid. There was a brief exchange on PF chat tonight about playing Russian roulette, and I offered my Glock 20, with a disclaimer that it wasn't *quite* as random as a revolver.Danger said:![]()
![]()
After all of these years thinking that you were humourless...![]()
GeorginaS said:And is there truly such a thing as a "fruitarian"?
That would be Sir Elton John, but I don't think that he has anything to do with this particular thread.GeorginaS said:And is there truly such a thing as a "fruitarian"?
turbo-1 said:I'm not humorless. Maine humor is pretty dry, so it doesn't hit you right away. Not well-suited to the 'web, I'm afraid. There was a brief exchange on PF chat tonight about playing Russian roulette, and I offered my Glock 20, with a disclaimer that it wasn't *quite* as random as a revolver.
Danger said:That would be Sir Elton John, but I don't think that he has anything to do with this particular thread.
As loathe as I am to admit defeat, there is absolutely no way that i can respond to that question that won't get me either censored or banned. It has something to do with where you draw the lines between eating, licking, sucking... I just really don't want to get involved.GeorginaS;2814614So said:, are we calling the "meat eater" option and omnivore, then? I mean, I know this is all scientific and important and stuff, so I'd hate to mess it up.
I didn't see a choice for embracing (not necessarily becoming) vegetarianism.Centaur said:Here are some big scientists who embraced (not necessarily became) vegetarianism.
The perfect fast food, by the way, consists of a chainsaw and a cow. Fire is optional.