Velocities seen from the center of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the velocities of two equal masses connected by a spring, viewed from the center of mass after one mass is given an initial velocity. The center of mass velocity is calculated as Vo/2, leading to confusion about the velocities of the individual masses from this reference frame. Participants suggest analyzing the velocities from the perspective of one mass to clarify the situation. When considering different masses, recalculating the center of mass speed is necessary while maintaining the same principles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding relative motion in mechanics.
dapias09
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm confused with the center of mass concept. Regard the following problem, we have a spring with negligible mass joined to two masses m1 and m2 (m1=m2) on a table without friction force. At t=0 a thrust Vo (initial velocity) is given to m2 with direction perpendicular to the spring direction (see figure adjoint). How are the velocities at t=0 seen from the center of mass?

At t=0 the m1 velocity seen from the laboratory is zero but this particle isn't fixed on the table.

Well, I guess that I should calculate the velocity of the center of mass as:
Vcm = m1V1 + m2V2 / (m1 + m2) = m2V2 / (m1 +m2) = Vo / 2, since m1 and m2 are equals.

So the initial situation is equivalent to give a thrust to the center of mass with velocity Vo/2, but how I know what are the velocities of m1 and m2 seen of the center of mass?

Can anyone help me?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • spring.jpg
    spring.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
dapias09 said:
Hello all,

I'm confused with the center of mass concept. Regard the following problem, we have a spring with negligible mass joined to two masses m1 and m2 (m1=m2) on a table without friction force. At t=0 a thrust Vo (initial velocity) is given to m2 with direction perpendicular to the spring direction (see figure adjoint). How are the velocities at t=0 seen from the center of mass?

At t=0 the m1 velocity seen from the laboratory is zero but this particle isn't fixed on the table.

Well, I guess that I should calculate the velocity of the center of mass as:
Vcm = m1V1 + m2V2 / (m1 + m2) = m2V2 / (m1 +m2) = Vo / 2, since m1 and m2 are equals.

So the initial situation is equivalent to give a thrust to the center of mass with velocity Vo/2, but how I know what are the velocities of m1 and m2 seen of the center of mass?

Can anyone help me?

Thanks in advance.

Ask yourself, instead, what are the velocities of m1 and the center of mass seen from m2. If you can figure that out for m2, use the same method for the center of mass.
 
Good idea!, James, thank you.

Just to check, isn't it -Vo for m1 and -Vo/2 for the center of mass seen from m2?
In this way, I have another question, do you know what should I do if the masses (m1 and m2) are different.

Greetings.
 
dapias09 said:
Good idea!, James, thank you.

Just to check, isn't it -Vo for m1 and -Vo/2 for the center of mass seen from m2?
In this way, I have another question, do you know what should I do if the masses (m1 and m2) are different.

Greetings.

In regards to your first question, if they are not, what does that say about the principle of (Galilean) relativity?

In regards to your second, clearly, the center of mass speed needs to be recalculated. The rest is the same as before :)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top