Velocity Acceleration and Gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of understanding velocity, acceleration, and gravity in physics, particularly in solving problems involving these concepts. The user expresses confusion about selecting the correct formulas for specific scenarios, such as calculating the stopping distance of the Concorde jet. Key advice includes converting units properly and identifying the relevant data provided in the problem, such as initial and final velocities and deceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of using appropriate formulas without introducing unnecessary variables. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the process of applying physics principles to problem-solving.
Tnn Ace03
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In physics we are studying velocity acceleration and gravity. Either i am stupid or am not understanding this, but i just can't seem to understand the material. for example i don't know which formula to use for which story problem, for example(Please do not answer the problem) With a cruising speed of 2.30 X 10 to the third km/h, the french supersonic passenger jet concorde is the fastest commercial airplane. Suppose the landing speed is 20.0 precent of the cruising speed. Over what distance(meters) does the plane travel to a complete stop if its deceleration has a magnitude of 5.80m/s squared

I know that i have to get the km/h into meters per second, but i don't know how to solve it.

Any help or tips would be greatly appreciatied
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve any problem, at least in the initial stages of education, look at what data you are supplied with, then use the appropriate formula that connects these data. And don't bring in new variables unncessarily.

Back to the problem...you are provided with the initial velocity ("landing speed") of the aircraft, the final velocity, and the decelaration ("negative accelaration"). Now, what formula can you use to find the distance traveled given the above information?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top