I Velocity addition via k-calculus

pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,396
Reaction score
1,573
We had a thread a while ago where a poster was particularly interested in the SR rule of velocity addition. And in that thread, I suggested a better foundation was the k-calculus approach, with a reference to Bondi's treatment in "Relativity and Common Sense".

Here I would like to show how to derive the special relativity velocity addition rule using some results from the k-calculus approach.

K calculus basically says that if a light signal is transmitted via some observer O and received by some observer A, there will be a doppler shift such that the received frequency at A is some multiple k of the transmitted frequency from O. This factor k is only dependent on the relative velocity v between two observers, not the distance between them.

Using the results from Bondi, one can use a simple radar setup to determine the relationship between k and v given the fact that the speed of light is constant for all observers.

This is not particularly hard, but somewhat lengthly, and would require diagrams to illustrate clearly. I will summarize the important results from Bondi as the following relations between k and v.

$$k = \sqrt{ \frac{1-\beta}{1+\beta } } $$

$$v = c \, \frac{1-k^2}{1+k^2} $$

Here c is the speed of light, and ##\beta = v/c##.

The part that I wish to show is how to compute the velocity addition formula from these results. Suppose we now have 3 observers, O, A, and B. And there is some velocity ##v_1## between the pair of observers (O,A), and some velocity ##v_2## between the pair of observers (A,B). We wish to find the velocity between the pair of observers (O,B), which we will denote as ##v_t##. We will also use the notation that ##\beta_1 = v_1/c## and ##\beta_2 = v_2/c##.

When we reformulate this in terms of doppler shift, we will note that there is some k-factor ##k_1## between observers (O,A) and some k-factor ##k_2## between observers (A,B). And we can conclude that the k factor between (O,B) is just the product of k_1 and k_2, namely.

$$k_t = k_1 * k_2$$

To see why this is true, take an example. Observer A emits light, whose frequency is multipled by some factor k_1, which we will take as 1/2, so that the frequency received by A is 1/2 the frequency emitted by O. Similarly, when B emits light, there will be some factor k_2, which we will take as 1/3, so that in the example observer B receives light at 1/3 the frequency emitted by A. We can then conclude that observer B in this example receives light at 1/6 the frequency as emitted by O, and more generally that the k-factor between O and A is just k_1 * k_2

The rest is algebra, which is perhaps slightly messy, but it's still just algebra. We write

$$k_t = \sqrt{ \frac{1-\beta_1} {1+\beta_1} \cdot \frac{1-\beta_2} {1+\beta_2} }$$
$$v_t = \frac{1-k_t{}^2}{1+k_t{}^2}$$

And when we simplify this we find

$$v_t = c \, \frac{\beta_1 + \beta_2} {1+\beta_1 \beta_2}$$

the expected velocity addition formula of special relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should post this as an Insight. In the forums it will just be lost among 200 threads misunderstanding the relativity of simultaneity.
 
For what it's worth, there is a Wikipedia article Bondi k-calculus with lots of diagrams. (Disclosure: I wrote most of it.)

 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Ibix and malawi_glenn
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top