Velocity at any point on a rotating sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the current density \(\vec{J}\) for a uniformly charged solid sphere of radius \(R\) and total charge \(Q\) spinning at a constant angular velocity \(\omega\) about the z-axis. The established formula for current density is \(\vec{J} = \rho r \omega \sin(\theta) \hat{\phi}\), where \(\rho = \frac{Q}{(4/3)\pi R^{3}}\) represents charge density. The velocity \(\vec{v}\) of any particle on the sphere is derived from the relationship \(\vec{v} = r \omega \sin(\theta) \hat{\phi}\), indicating that particles further from the z-axis move faster due to their radial distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid mechanics and rotational motion
  • Familiarity with electrodynamics concepts, particularly charge density
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their applications
  • Basic proficiency in vector calculus and physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity in rotating systems, focusing on spherical coordinates
  • Explore the applications of current density in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the implications of angular momentum in charged rotating bodies
  • Review Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" for deeper insights into related problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrodynamics, mechanical engineering, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating charged bodies.

Maxarthur
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A uniformly charged solid sphere, of radius R and total charge Q, is centered at the origin and spinning at a constant angular velocity ω about the z axis. Find the current density \vec{J} at any point (r,θ,\phi) within the sphere."
Problem 5.6(b), p.223, from "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by Griffiths, 4th Edition.

Homework Equations



\vec{J}=ρ\vec{v}.

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is: \vec{J}=ρrωsin(θ)\hat{\phi}, with \vec{v}=rωsin(θ)\hat{\phi}, and ρ=\frac{Q}{(4/3)πR^{3}}.

Now, my real question: where did the expression for the velocity came from?
It makes sense that the velocity of any particle on a rotating sphere is given by \vec{v}=rωsin(θ)\hat{\phi}, since v is proportional to r, points further away from the origin will be moving faster than those closer to it, ω is the radial velocity, and rω comes from the velocity of a particle in a rotating disk; rωsin(θ), θ being the angle between r and the z-axis, tells us that particles farther away from the z-axis will be moving faster than those closer to it: (assuming we're on the surface) since sin(0)=0 \Rightarrow v=0 is the velocity of the point located at (0,0,R), which is not moving; and sin(π/2)=1 \Rightarrow v is maximum, therefore all the points of any great circle are the fastest.
And \hat{\phi} just tells us the direction in which the points of the sphere are moving.
Assuming my interpretation of the velocity equation is correct (correct me if wrong), I ask, where did the equation came from in the first place? I'm sure there has to be an analytical way of deriving such equation, and that it wasn't just a intuitive construction.
Thank you for your time, and let me tell you that I'm happy to belong to this community, this being my very first post (I apologize for any issues with the format of my comment); get used to see my username around here. :D

-Maxarthur

P.S: Every time that I hit the "Preview post" button, the "2. Homework Equations , ..." subsections get written on my message box. Why could this be? It's annoying having to erase them every time..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can build a sphere by stacking an infinite number of co-centric circles with different radii on each other.Now if the sphere rotates around an axis passing through its poles,all those circles are doing so too with the same angular velocity but because the radii are different,the linear velocity of the points residing on the circles becomes different.r\sin{\theta} is the formula for the radii of those circles which can be easily derived by drawing the shape of what I explained and checking the relation between the radius of the sphere and the radii of those circles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
912
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K