Velocity-Composition Law w/ c=1: Deriving the Formula

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SiennaTheGr8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Picture
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the velocity-composition law when the speed of light, c, equals 1, resulting in the formula v = (u + w) / (1 + uw). It highlights that this formula remains valid even when u represents light speed, yielding v = 1. The conversation also contrasts traditional Lorentz transformation methods with a more basic approach that differentiates spatial and temporal coordinates, emphasizing that the derivation is fundamentally about the transformation properties of tangent vectors along world lines.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with four-velocity concepts
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions, specifically tanh
  • Basic principles of special relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore the properties of four-velocity in special relativity
  • Learn about hyperbolic functions and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the implications of the velocity-composition law in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic mechanics.

SiennaTheGr8
Messages
523
Reaction score
220
(##c = 1##)

So:

##v = \dfrac{u + w}{1 + uw}##.

If the thing with speed ##u## happens to be light, then the equation still works:

##v = \dfrac{(1) + w}{1 + (1)(w)} = 1##.

And the inverse formula still works, too:

##u = \dfrac{v - w}{1 - vw} = \dfrac{(1) - w}{1 - (1)w} = 1##

But is this mere happenstance? To wit:

1. The often-preferred method of deriving the formula involves Lorentz-transforming the relevant spatial component of the four-velocity. But four-velocity is undefined for anything whose ##v = 1##.

2. A more elegant way of writing the formula is:

##\tanh \phi_v = \tanh (\phi_u + \phi_w)##,

where ##\phi_v = \tanh^{-1} v## (etc.). But the argument of the ##\tanh^{-1}## function must have an absolute value less than ##1##, so if ##v = 1## then ##\phi_v = \tanh^{-1} v## is no good.

Hm.

On the other hand, you can derive the formula in a more "basic" way by Lorentz-transforming the ##x## and ##t## coordinates (in standard configuration), and differentiating the former with respect to the latter. As far as I can tell, this derivation avoids the problem noted above.

I'm not really sure what my point is, but I found this interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SiennaTheGr8 said:
The often-preferred method of deriving the formula involves Lorentz-transforming the relevant spatial component of the four-velocity.
This is really just a special case. The only requirement necessary is that the vector you consider is the tangent vector of a world line. What you are really looking at is the ratio
$$
\frac{dx^i}{dx^0} = \frac{dx^i/ds}{dx^0/ds}
$$
and its transformation properties. It does not matter what the world-line parameter ##s## is. You can take it to be the proper time, which gives you the ratio of the 4-velocity components, but you don't need to do that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and SiennaTheGr8

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K