Velocity of a relativistic particle in a uniform magnetic field

B Rylen
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I am trying to solve for the velocity of a relativistic particle in a magnetic field using magnetic force (F = q(v x B)) and F = dp/dt (where p = ɣmv) and equating the two equations to each other. However, I stuck on how to isolate v in this setup.
Relevant Equations
F = dp/dt = d(ɣmv)/dt
F = q(v x B)
ɣ = 1/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)
d(ɣmv)/dt = qvB
(dɣ/dt)mv + ɣm(dv/dt) = qvB
Substituting gamma in and using the chain rule, it ends up simplifying to the following:
ɣ^3*m(dv/dt) = qvB

Now, I am confused on how to solve for v.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
B Rylen said:
(dɣ/dt)mv + ɣm(dv/dt) = qvB
Your problem is one of using scalars instead of vectors. The force is orthogonal to velocity so the speed is constant. Hence (dɣ/dt) = 0.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes B Rylen, Delta2, vanhees71 and 1 other person
It should also be mentioned that dv/dt (where v is the speed and not velocity) is also equal to zero.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Delta2, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
Another possibility is to solve the manifestly covariant equations using the proper time ##\tau## as the parameter of the trajectory/world line. This usually simplifies such calculations!
 
B Rylen said:
Homework Statement:: I am trying to solve for the velocity of a relativistic particle in a magnetic field using magnetic force (F = q(v x B)) and F = dp/dt (where p = ɣmv) and equating the two equations to each other.
Are you assuming that the particle is orbiting in a plane perpendicular to the field? If so, you will need to choose which parameters you want to use for expressing the speed v. Besides q, B, and m there is the radius R of the orbit, the period T of the orbit, and the frequency f (or angular frequency ω) of the orbit.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top