Velocity of Ball When Just Starting to Roll in Relation to Collision Speed v0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the velocity of a billiards ball just starting to roll and the initial speed v0 after being struck. The calculations indicate that the speed at which the ball begins to roll, denoted as v2, is 5/7 of the initial speed v0. This conclusion is reached through the conservation of angular momentum and the application of frictional forces during the transition from gliding to rolling. Participants clarify the connection between Euler's laws and Newton's laws, particularly regarding angular momentum. The final consensus confirms the derived relationship between the velocities.
Jotun.uu
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A billiards ball (mass m) is hit by a billiard stick on the center of the ball (from the side) with a collision impulse mv0 so that the cues line of travel goes straight through the center of mass of the billiards ball, which in the collision-approximation gives a speed v0 immediately after the collision. The angular velocity is equal to zero directly after the collision (the ball glides, before it starts to roll). The frictioncoefficient is u, and the ball starts at rest.
Find the relationship between the velocity of the ball when it has just started rolling and the speed v0 directly after the collision.


Homework Equations



F = ma = m*dv/dt
small f = friction.
time ball is hit = t0.
time ball stops gliding = t1.
velocity of ball when it is about to start rolling = v1, and velocity when it starts rolling is v2.
R is the radius of the ball.
The moment of inertia of the ball I = (2/5)mR².
the angular acceleration is called alpha = dw/dt, where w = omega meaning the angular velocity.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I believe I have solved this question, but I'm sure you can find something I did wrong =).

the integral of the powers affecting the ball along the x-axis is the integral of friction (f) and the collision impulse mv0.
Integral from t0->t1:mv0dt = mv0(t1)-mv0(t0)
Normal N from the ground is mg. friction f = -uN integrated like above over time is -uN(t1-t0). I now assume that the time it glides is very small so that t1-t0 = 0.

Therefore mv0(t1) = mv0(t0) which means that v0(t1) = v0(t0), which in turn means that v1 = v0.

keep in mind that mdv/dt = ma = -f for later. (1)

Now I used Eulers II law stating that the sum of the moment Mz = fR = I*alpha which means that f = I*alpha/R

(1) mdv = -I*dw/R
I now integrate from v0 (which remember is equal to v1!) to v2 and I also integrate for the angular velocity from 0 (since it was gliding) to v2/R, because v = w*R. I've also removed m from the equation now since it was on both sides of the = sign.

(integrate v0 -> v2: dv) = -(2/5)R (integral 0 -> v2/R: dw) => v2 - v0 = -(2/5)v2.
Solving for v2 I got the answer: v2 = 5v0/7 which means that when you hit the ball, the speed it will have when it starts to roll is 5/7's the speed you hit it with!

Am I right in these calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. :smile:
 
Here is a much faster way to answer this question. (I already started it before seeing tiny-tim's posting ** Edit: Doc Al not tiny-tim, sorry **.) You start with a ball sliding (but not rolling) with a center of mass velocity v0. You end up with a rolling ball with center of mass velocity v. The angular momentum of the ball relative to the point of contact is conserved. So

Lbefore = m v0 R
Lafter = I ω

where I is about the point of contact.

I = \frac{2}{5}m R^{2} + m R^{2}=\frac{7}{5}m R^{2}

Since the ball rolls without slipping in the end ω = v / R. Then

m v_{0}R = \frac{7}{5}m R^{2}\frac{v}{R}

v = \frac{5}{7}v_{0}

By the way, what is Euler's II law? Is that what in other parts of the world is known as Newton's Second Law?
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
By the way, what is Euler's II law? Is that what in other parts of the world is known as Newton's Second Law?

From wikipedia:
"Euler's second law states that the sum of the external moments about a point is equal to the rate of change of angular momentum about that point."

Common usage is Moment = I*alpha
 
I believe that Newtons II law is Eulers I law btw.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top