Velocity of Light vs Train: Why the Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Train Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the difference in how velocities are perceived, particularly regarding the speed of light compared to everyday objects like a ball. When a ball is released from a train moving at 100 mph, it appears to move at 180 mph to an observer on the ground, but this is an approximation valid only at low speeds. In contrast, light always travels at a constant speed, denoted as 'c', regardless of the motion of the source or observer, as explained by the principles of special relativity. Some participants mention that while light's speed is considered constant, there are theories suggesting it may change over billions of years, although this is not observable in practical terms. The consensus emphasizes that for all practical purposes, the speed of light remains a constant in physics.
ranger
Gold Member
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
2
Lets say that I'm on a trian moving a velocity of 100 mph, and I release a ball with a velocity of 80 mph in the same direction the train is moving. The ball would appear to move at a velocity of 180 mph to someone on the ground right? Well what would happen if I shoot a beam of light. The light beam can't move at a speed of C + 100 mph, because nothing can go faster than C. To someone on the ground, the light beam would still move a constant speed C.
Why does this happen?

--thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
relativistic addition of velocities

ranger said:
The ball would appear to move at a velocity of 180 mph to someone on the ground right?
That's just an approximation good at low speeds. The velocities actually add like this:
v = \frac{v_1 + v_2}{1 + v_1 v_2/c^2}
To understand better why this is so, read up on special relativity.
 
Intuitive said:
I think if you had head lights on a spacecraft that shown forwards as you theoretically approached light speed then the light emitting from your head lights would (appear) to slow down from the observer in the space craft,
If Light emitting from the head lights was traveling 186,282 miles a second and the spacecraft was traveling at 186,281 miles a second then the light emitting from the head lights would appear to be traveling at 1 mile a second to the observer in the space craft.
Not true at all! The light would travel at the same speed (c) whether observed from the spacecraft or from the Earth.
 
Doc Al said:
Not true at all! The light would travel at the same speed (c) whether observed from the spacecraft or from the Earth.

Yea, that it because c is a constant. Its value never changes.
 
ranger said:
Yea, that it because c is a constant. Its value never changes.

in actuality the value does change


.. but it takes a few billion years.

I won't say that it doesn't change because there has been 'proof' somehow that it does.. and the proof is over my head so I can't really dispell it.. but considering I'm not going to be here in a few billion years to see that light did in fact change by a decimal of a meter per second... so I think its safe to consider it a constant .. even if skeptics will badger it to the bitter end.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top