Velocity of particles on a disc

AI Thread Summary
Particles on a rotating disc have varying velocities depending on their position relative to the ground, with the point of contact having zero velocity. As you move from the bottom to the top of the disc, the velocity of particles increases due to their circular motion. The rim particles maintain a constant speed relative to the center of mass, but their direction changes, resulting in different velocities at various points. When considering the entire wheel's motion, vector analysis shows how velocities combine, leading to the observed differences. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the misconception about constant velocity at the rim.
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
According to this website, particles of the disc that are located at the point of contact between the ground and the disc have a velocity of zero, and the velocity of each of the particles increases as you move from the bottom of the disc to the top of the disc. How is this possible? I always thought the particles on the rim of a wheel had constant velocity, no matter where they're located.
http://cnx.org/content/m14311/latest/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've figured this out.
If you think of the ground as a fulcrum about which a wheel is rotating then the point of contact between the ground and the wheel is going to have zero velocity.
 
The particles on the rim have constant speed relative to the center of mass (e.g. the reference frame where the axle stays in one place). The velocity is different for each point because they are moving in different directions (at the common speed).

Draw vectors for the top, bottom, and a few other points. Now add a vector where the whole wheel is also moving, thus adding the same overall vector to each of the sample rim vectors. You'll see that it cancels out on one side, doubles on the opposite side, and so on.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top