Velocity of spring mass system with spring mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a mass in a spring-mass system, considering the mass of the spring itself. The user initially proposed a complex formula to account for the spring's weight and mass but later simplified it, realizing that the weight was already factored into the forces. They clarified that the spring and mass are oriented vertically and gravity is a factor in their calculations. There is a suggestion to use an integral for a more accurate analysis, and the importance of clear mathematical presentation is emphasized. The user seeks confirmation on whether their revised approach is correct or overly complicated.
Jwil
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am having a hard time figuring out how to calculate the velocity of a mass in a spring-mass system with respect to distance, where the spring has a mass to it. The spring would be a long steel cable and a force of 4000 lbs would be applied to the system along the line of action. The cable is assumed to be long enough that it can be assumed to have a constant force. I have looked at it a couple different ways but not sure if it is correct. What I have come up with is:

v=√(2*(F-Wc*Lc)*d/(m+(Mc*Lc)))

where,
v = velocity
F = input force
Wc = weight of cable/unit length
Lc = length of cable retracted
Mc = mass of cable/unit length
d = equals distance
m= mass of the mass (sorry that may be confusing)

I was trying to add the cable weight and mass to the system as it contracts. Am I on the right track? Or am I way over complicating this and the mass and weight of the cable can assume to be negligible?

I was starting to think I should use an integral to figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect the reason you haven't gotten any responses is because the questions is really confusing. Can you be explicit in exactly what you're asking?

Oh, and a tip, use the math script, it makes the math much easier to read, when you write it out in text, it makes it difficult to understand.
 
After reading it again today I can see how it would be confusing. I am trying to find velocity of the mass that is connected to a really long spring that also has mass. The spring is initially stretched with some known force F. The mass is then released with initial velocity being zero. How would I find the velocity of the mass at a given distance from its initial starting point?

V=\sqrt{\frac{2*F*d}{m+Mc}}

I changed it from what I originally had because I realized I already factor in weight when I calculated the summation of forces at both ends. Also the spring and mass are oriented vertically and gravity is not neglected. Is that more clear or should I draw a picture?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top