Velocity of spring mass system with spring mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a mass in a spring-mass system, considering the mass of the spring itself. The user initially proposed a complex formula to account for the spring's weight and mass but later simplified it, realizing that the weight was already factored into the forces. They clarified that the spring and mass are oriented vertically and gravity is a factor in their calculations. There is a suggestion to use an integral for a more accurate analysis, and the importance of clear mathematical presentation is emphasized. The user seeks confirmation on whether their revised approach is correct or overly complicated.
Jwil
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am having a hard time figuring out how to calculate the velocity of a mass in a spring-mass system with respect to distance, where the spring has a mass to it. The spring would be a long steel cable and a force of 4000 lbs would be applied to the system along the line of action. The cable is assumed to be long enough that it can be assumed to have a constant force. I have looked at it a couple different ways but not sure if it is correct. What I have come up with is:

v=√(2*(F-Wc*Lc)*d/(m+(Mc*Lc)))

where,
v = velocity
F = input force
Wc = weight of cable/unit length
Lc = length of cable retracted
Mc = mass of cable/unit length
d = equals distance
m= mass of the mass (sorry that may be confusing)

I was trying to add the cable weight and mass to the system as it contracts. Am I on the right track? Or am I way over complicating this and the mass and weight of the cable can assume to be negligible?

I was starting to think I should use an integral to figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect the reason you haven't gotten any responses is because the questions is really confusing. Can you be explicit in exactly what you're asking?

Oh, and a tip, use the math script, it makes the math much easier to read, when you write it out in text, it makes it difficult to understand.
 
After reading it again today I can see how it would be confusing. I am trying to find velocity of the mass that is connected to a really long spring that also has mass. The spring is initially stretched with some known force F. The mass is then released with initial velocity being zero. How would I find the velocity of the mass at a given distance from its initial starting point?

V=\sqrt{\frac{2*F*d}{m+Mc}}

I changed it from what I originally had because I realized I already factor in weight when I calculated the summation of forces at both ends. Also the spring and mass are oriented vertically and gravity is not neglected. Is that more clear or should I draw a picture?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top