Velocity of two different species in a gas with propagating sound wave

AI Thread Summary
In a gas with two species of atoms differing significantly in mass, sound waves propagate through the medium, but the particle motion is not directly correlated to the wave speed. The discussion clarifies that the particle velocity, which describes how gas molecules oscillate around their positions, differs from the speed of sound itself. Heavier molecules will not accelerate as much as lighter ones due to their mass, affecting their response to sound waves. Understanding these dynamics requires distinguishing between the motion of individual molecules and the overall wave propagation. Theoretical implications suggest that while both species experience sound waves, their velocities will differ based on their mass and the nature of the sound wave's pressure and rarefaction.
bohrpi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a theoretical question which I would like to brainstorm, and would appreciate any assistance.

Let's say sound waves are propagated through a gas, with two types of atoms with very different mass, different by say a factor of ten. The number of particles per unit volume is equal, as are there temperatures. The gas is collisional. I would like to know if the sound wave causes one species to go faster than the other, and if so, how much faster?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Your question is not specific: when you say “the sound wave causes one species to go faster than the other” are you referring to the motion of the individual gas molecules? If yes, then that’s not the way particle motion caused by sound pressure and rarefaction waves is characterized. Normally a "parcel of the gas" is described. For instance, this from Wiki:

“Particle velocity should not be confused with the speed of the wave as it passes through the medium, i.e. in the case of a sound wave, particle velocity is not the same as the speed of sound. The wave moves relatively fast, while the particles oscillate around their original position with a relatively small particle velocity. Particle velocity should also not be confused with the velocity of individual molecules.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_velocity

Naturally, a more massive molecule would not accelerate as much as a less massive one. This page should add to your understanding of the mechanisms involved: “In classical mechanics, acceleration is related to force and mass (assumed to be constant) by way of Newton's second law:”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_acceleration

“A particle of the medium undergoes displacement according to the particle velocity of the wave traveling through the medium, while the sound wave itself moves at the speed of sound, equal to 343 m/s in air at 20 °C.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_displacement
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top