Velocity perpendicular to acceleration

AI Thread Summary
In uniform circular motion, velocity is always tangent to the circle, while acceleration points towards the center, making them perpendicular. This relationship can be demonstrated mathematically by differentiating the position vector to find the velocity vector and then differentiating again to find the acceleration vector. The dot product of the velocity and acceleration vectors equals zero, confirming their perpendicularity. Visualizing the motion with vectors helps clarify that the change in velocity (dv) is perpendicular to the velocity vector (v). It's important to note that while velocity and acceleration can be parallel in simple cases, they are not always so in more complex scenarios.
Zay d
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
this is getting me really worried, why and why is velocity perpendicular to acceleration in uniform circular motion? please help me in conceptual way and practice too
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all this is not quantum mechanical question.
The circular motion equation is r(t)=cos(t)i+sin(t)j.Now differantiate it respect to time.You will find speed vector.And then differantiate it again you will find acceleration vector.

Perpandicular means dot product will be zero.So you need to find v.a=? Find it and then share the answer here so I can be sure you find true answer.
 
Yep, the key is that v and a are vectors. Try this:

1. Draw a circle with vector v's tail end on the circle and v tangent to the circle.
2. Picture v moving around the circle at constant speed.
3. Consider v at a position, v0.
4. A very short time later (dt), v moves to a new position v1 so v1 forms a small angle with v0.
5. To get dv (=v1-v0), move the tail of v1 to the tail of v0 while keeping the angle between them constant.
6. Construct a small vector with the tail at the tip of v0 and the tip at the tip of v1. This is dv.
7. It should be clear that dv is perpendicular to v.
8. Since dv occurs over the time dt, dv/dt = a is in the same direction as dv.

Hope this helps.
 
In general, there is no reason why velocity and acceleration vectors should 'always' be parallel. It's a common occurrence for them to be parallel in simple situations but not in real life. The perpendicular situation is also pretty rare, in practice.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top