Velocity, position, acceleration graph help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics student struggling with a velocity/time graph problem, specifically calculating the distance traveled from t=0 to t=0.4 seconds. The key point is that the area under the velocity/time graph represents the distance, and users suggest breaking the area into manageable shapes for calculation. The student encounters difficulty due to the graph's curvature, prompting questions about finding the area of irregular shapes. For determining the object's position at t=0.4 seconds, it's noted that the initial position is necessary alongside the distance traveled. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding graph interpretation and the relationship between distance, velocity, and position.
Physicshelpneeded
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
im new to this site...so i don't kno whow this works...ANYWAYS...

so you guys know : I am 16, taking a college course at mt sac (physics 1)...and I am kind of struggling because my math isn't as high as it nees to be for the coruse and because i don't understand soem concepts.

im having trouble with a velocity/time graph problem... the question asks me to determine the distance moved by the object in the time interval from t=0 to t=0.4 (since u guys can't see the graph, i will tell u...the velocity moves from 3.4 to 3.9 in 4 seconds) anyone know how to do this?

the second part to this problem is What additional information do you need to determine the position of the object at t=0.4 s? explain.

CAN ANYONE HELP ME WITH THIS? Thanks guys! (and if you are a girl, girls) :wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two ways of doing this but you want to do it the graph way. The most important thing to remember is that the area under a velocity/time graph is equal to the distance travelled. So isolate the area under the graph from said interval and divide it up into simple shapes - squares/triangles. It's just very easy geometry from there.

For the second half I'm not sure what they mean by that.
 
Last edited:
thanks for the advice! :) it helped a littel bit...but the problem i have is that the graph is curved...and makes a triangle and an almost-full rectangle...but not an actual one...so how would i find the area of the weird shape? is there a secret way or formula? :confused:

and can anyon eelse help me with part 2? :confused:


thanx :smile:
 
I think Mr peanut already said this , if you must do it graphically ( and the shape is not a rectangle - then you divide the shape into small but measureable sections. Typically use a given small section of time say 0.1 seconds and divide the x-axis ( time ) into a number of the sections.In each section measure the y value ( velocity) -- the strip area is thus v*dt . Add up all the sections to get the total area the result is the distance.The accuracy is dependant on the size of dt chosen.
Do you have a typo in the question you said the velocity changes from 3.4 to 3.9 in '4' seconds . did you mean 0.4.
 
yes, i meant 0.4...thanx for ur help...does anyone else know anything about this particular question?


and can ANYONE answer part 2? :confused: :frown:
 
Part 2:
Assuming you know the distance traveled in the time interval, you'll also need the initial position in order to determine the final position
(I assumed that during the time interval the particle moved in a straight line from the initial position)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top