Verifying Gauss' Law: Homework Statement Solutions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves verifying Gauss' Law using a given flux density vector field. The tasks include determining the charge density, calculating the total charge enclosed within a specified volume, and confirming Gauss's law by evaluating the net flux through the surface of that volume.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of divergence to find charge density and the integration process for calculating total charge enclosed. There is uncertainty regarding the correct approach to verifying Gauss's law, particularly in relation to integrating the flux density over the cube's surfaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the integration process for the flux density. Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations, while others offer guidance on the correct approach to integrating over the cube's surfaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating vector fields and ensuring proper application of Gauss's law. There is a recognition of the need to consider all sides of the cube in the flux calculation.

ryukyu
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the given flux density: [tex]\vec{D}[/tex]=(2y2+z)[tex]\widehat{x}[/tex]+(4xy)[tex]\widehat{y}[/tex]^+(xz)[tex]\widehat{z}[/tex]
a)Determine the charge density.
b)Find the total charge enclosed if the surface is 0<x<1, 0<y<1, 0<z<1 (unit cube)
c)Confirm Gauss’s law by finding the net flux through the surface of the volume.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I used divergence to find the [tex]\rho[/tex]v=5x

To find Qenc I integrated [tex]\int\int\int[/tex]5xdxdydz and came up with
Qenc=5/2 C

The last step I know is to verify that [tex]\oint[/tex][tex]\vec{D}[/tex]dS=Qenc.

From what I gather since the divergence only has an x-component we will integrate only the x-component over the dxdydz, but this gives me 7/2. I'm guessing both are incorrect, but obviously at least one of them is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ryukyu said:
1.

The last step I know is to verify that [tex]\oint[/tex][tex]\vec{D}[/tex]dS=Qenc.

From what I gather since the divergence only has an x-component we will integrate only the x-component over the dxdydz, but this gives me 7/2. I'm guessing both are incorrect, but obviously at least one of them is.


The divergence is a scalar, and you have to integrate the flux density for all sides of the cube. Remember that the surface element dS is a vector normal to the surface.


ehild
 
Thanks for the response and the insight.

So for the top of said cube I would integrate the z-hat coefficient by dydx?
the bottom by z-hat (-dydx)
the right by y-hat (dxdz)
left by y-hat(-dxdz)
front by x-hat(dydz)
and back x-hat(-dydz)...
 
It looks OK.

ehild
 
I apologize for not saying thanks again. I do find this site a valuable resource in attempting to learn this material instead of just blindly using equations and hoping that things work out.
 
You are welcome.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K