Verifying Solidity/Hollowness of a Copper Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter jpfelgueiras
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the solidity of a copper object by analyzing its weight in air and water. The copper object has a density of 8.96 g/cm³ and weighs 2.8 N in air and 1.3 N when submerged in water with a density of 0.998 g/cm³. By applying Archimedes' principle, the buoyant force can be calculated, allowing for the determination of the object's volume and, subsequently, its density. If the calculated density matches the known density of copper, the object is solid; otherwise, it is hollow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Archimedes' principle
  • Basic knowledge of density calculations
  • Familiarity with weight measurements in different mediums
  • Knowledge of unit conversions (g/cm³ to kg/m³)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Archimedes' principle in detail
  • Learn about buoyancy and its applications in fluid mechanics
  • Explore density calculation methods for various materials
  • Investigate the effects of submersion on weight measurements
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, materials scientists, and anyone involved in the analysis of material properties and buoyancy effects.

jpfelgueiras
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I got a small conserning how to determine if a object is solid or hollow.
"Verify if a copper object with density of 8,96 g/m^3, which weights 2,8N on the air and when submersive on water (p=998 kg/m^3) weights 1,3N, is it solid or hollow?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How could you solve for the density of the object? (Note that the density given for copper should be in g/cm^3, not g/m^3.)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K