Verifying Stroke's Theorem & Fourier Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter installer2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying Stoke's Theorem with a specific vector field and surface, as well as exploring Fourier series for a given function. The original poster seeks urgent assistance due to an upcoming exam.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss evaluating both the surface integral and the path integral to verify Stoke's Theorem. There is also mention of checking the Fourier series at specific points to deduce certain series results.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the necessary evaluations and have prompted the original poster to clarify their understanding of Stoke's Theorem and the required integrals. There is an ongoing exploration of the problem without a clear consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses urgency due to an impending exam, which may influence the depth of their understanding and the nature of the responses received.

installer2001
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Strokes theorem & Fourier series

Respected guys.
i need ur help ...urgent help bcoz tomorow is my paper.


1);Verify strokes thorem for F=6zi+(2x+y)j-xk where S is upper half of circle x^2+y^2+z^2=1 bounded by close curve c x^2+y^2=1 at z=0 plane

2):With the help of Fourier Sine series and Fourier Cosine series
f(x)=x+1 0<x<Π(pie)
Deduce 1-1/3+1/5-1/7 --------------------- = Π(pie)/4
1+1/(3^2)+1/(5^2)+1/(7^2)--------= Π^2/8
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1) They want you to avaluate the surface integral. Then the path integral, and show that they have the same value, as predicted by Stoke's thm.

2) Try evaluating both sides of the equation (i.e. f(x) = its Fourier series) series at a precise point, such as x=0 for which all the sines vanish and all the cos become 1.
 
well thz but can u explain it in more detail
 
Respect the problem as well as the 'guys'! What work have you done yourself? Quasar987 told you what you need to do. Do you know what Stoke's Theorem says? What is the line integral you need to do? What is the path integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K