I Vertex function, quantum action

The black vegetable
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am looking at Srednicki ch 64 , how does equation 64.1 follow from 64.3 as stated.

Explicitly in QED how does
##
u_{s'}(p')V^{u}(p',p)u_{s}(p)=e\bar{u'}(F_{1}(q^{2})\gamma ^{u}-\frac{i}{m}F_{2}(q^{2})S^{uv}q_{v})u
##

follow from the quantum action
##
\Gamma =\int d^{4}x(eF_{1}\bar{\varphi }\not{A}\varphi+\frac{e}{2m}F_{2}(0)F_{uv}\bar{\varphi }S^{uv}\varphi + ...
##
Where the… represent more derivatives

Is it from the derivative expansion of the quantum action, (chapter 21 equation 21.19)

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression for ##\Gamma## indeed follows from writing down the quantum action considering the symmetries of QED (gauge symmetry, P invariance, C invariance, T invariance). Then going to the 1st equation is done as usual by mode expansion of the Dirac field to get the corresponding vertex (photon-electron-positron vertex). The ##F_1## and ##F_2## are form factors. In general they are function of ##q^2## as indicated in the first formula, but here obviously Srednicky considers only the on-shell limit of the photon. The most important thing is that you can extract the anomalous magnetic moment from these form factors. Since QED is renormalizable, only ##F_1## needs renormalization while ##F_2## is finite at any order of perturbation theory.
 
ok thanks , i tried to look up mode expansion of dirac field, couldn't find how it gives the vertex function,
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top