Vertical Motion with Linear Drag Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of vertical motion with linear drag as presented in Taylor's Classical Mechanics. It begins with the equation m\dot{v}_{y}=mg - bv_{y}, leading to the terminal velocity v_{ter} when acceleration is zero. The book then introduces a new equation, m\dot{v}_{y} = -b(v_{y} - v_{ter}), prompting questions about its derivation and the exclusion of gravity. Participants clarify that this formulation is specific to one-dimensional motion where gravity opposes drag. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexities of drag and its typical non-linear nature.
opprobe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I was looking through a Taylor's Classical Mechanics chapter and I have a question about the derivation.

So basically, it starts out with m\dot{v}_{y}=mg - bv_{y} and you find v_{ter} by letting m\dot{v}_{y}=0 where when you solve for v_{y} you will get v_{ter}. Now the book states how we must now discuss how the projectile approaches that speed and the formula it writes is m\dot{v}_{y} = -b(v_{y} - v_{ter}). Although I get the general idea behind it, can someone explain to me exactly what's going on?

Is this function specific to the 1D case where gravity is the counteracting force to drag?
How was he able to replace v_{y} with v_{y} - v_{ter} and exclude gravity?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
opprobe said:
I was looking through a Taylor's Classical Mechanics chapter and I have a question about the derivation.

So basically, it starts out with m\dot{v}_{y}=mg - bv_{y} and you find v_{ter} by letting m\dot{v}_{y}=0 where when you solve for v_{y} you will get v_{ter}. Now the book states how we must now discuss how the projectile approaches that speed and the formula it writes is m\dot{v}_{y} = -b(v_{y} - v_{ter}). Although I get the general idea behind it, can someone explain to me exactly what's going on?

Is this function specific to the 1D case where gravity is the counteracting force to drag?
How was he able to replace v_{y} with v_{y} - v_{ter} and exclude gravity?

Thanks!
substitute: mg = bvter ... hint: what is the terminal velocity equal to?

This equation is very specific yes, the idea is to give you an idea about derivations. Drag is not normally linear.
 
Haha. Alright - I got it thanks!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top