Very basic phisics, hydraulics and weights, wrong diagram?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of hydraulics, specifically addressing the relationship between force, pressure, and the mechanics of hydraulic systems. Participants explore examples involving weights and the behavior of fluids in hydraulic systems, questioning the apparent contradictions in force distribution and pressure effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a 5kg weight on one side of a hydraulic system leads to a specific water level change, referencing a diagram that shows a car being lifted with a fraction of its weight on the other side.
  • Another participant explains the concept of a force multiplier in hydraulic systems, noting that the area ratio between pistons allows for a significant reduction in the force needed to lift heavy objects.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the relationship between equal forces on both sides of a hydraulic system, suggesting that the examples presented seem contradictory.
  • One participant emphasizes that the pressure distribution in the system does not make an object lighter, arguing that the force exerted must account for both the applied force and the weight of the fluid.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of work being conserved in hydraulic systems, explaining that the movement of fluid in different sized pistons results in a trade-off between force and distance moved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of hydraulic principles, particularly regarding the relationship between force, pressure, and the behavior of weights in hydraulic systems. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in understanding the assumptions underlying hydraulic mechanics, particularly in relation to force distribution and pressure effects. There are unresolved questions about the implications of these principles in practical scenarios.

losbellos
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hej Guys,

I am just wondering. See the picture.

weights.jpg


If I put 5kg on the right the water lever increases and the new water level on the left should be as much higher as 5kg volume of water. Its so obvious isn't it?

So if it is obvious can you please tell me that why it is possible that in a exactly the same
- http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pasc.html#hpress - diagram they hold a car with a fraction of the weight of a car on the left side?
I can't understand it how it would be possible...Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
losbellos said:
So if it is obvious can you please tell me that why it is possible that in a exactly the same
- http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pasc.html#hpress - diagram they hold a car with a fraction of the weight of a car on the left side?
I can't understand it how it would be possible...

It's a force multiplier.

From the link:
For example, if the lift cylinder were 25 cm in diameter and the small cylinder were 1.25 cm in diameter, then the ratio of the areas is 400, so the hydraulic press arrangement gives a multiplication of 400 times the force. To lift a 6000 Newton car, you would have to exert only 6000 N/400 = 15 N on the fluid in the small cylinder to lift the car. However, to lift the car 10 cm, you would have to move the oil 400 x 10cm = 40 meters. This is practical by pumping oil into this small cylinder with a small compressor.

It works kind of like a wrench. A short wrench requires much more force to turn something than a longer wrench does. However, the longer wrench has to move a much greater distance. So you're trading distance moved for an increased force multiplier.

It's the same concept as me giving you a huge lever and you lifting up a tank with just your body weight.
 
I understand what you write but then the 5kg/5kg example why true as well? can you help me understand that?
You see I feel troubled because this two example is somewhat opposing?

I have a feeling that we talk aside.. See this example. I if put 100 Newton force the other side 100 Newton force must come out. Not less force is enough top hold against 100 Newton force.
weigth2.jpg


or here is an other example. THere is the 100N push downwards that is distributes the force on the watered surface and then on the other side there will be less pressure? No it have to be 100 N + water weight.

In other way the pressure distribution on the wall doesn't make the object lighter down on the other side... Just think about this, its not possible thet a 10kg object would be lighter to hold up, because of...

weights4.jpg
 
Last edited:
Consider that work is force * distance. If you push a large amount of fluid with a large piston into a small piston, the small piston will move much farther than large piston. The work is conserved, so pushing on a large piston must reduce the force that the small piston pushes with, since the small piston moves farther.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
yeah this is clear thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K