Very massive object colliding with tiny mass at high momentum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daveyp225
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Momentum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of a proton traveling at near light-speed colliding with Earth, exploring the implications of such a collision, including comparisons with a small asteroid of equivalent momentum. Participants consider the nature of the collision, whether it could be elastic, and the potential aftermath of a non-elastic collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the nature of the collision, suggesting it would not be elastic and discussing the implications of momentum conservation in relativistic contexts.
  • One participant speculates that a proton could transfer significant energy to Earth, potentially causing fragmentation, while others express skepticism about the extent of damage a single proton could inflict.
  • There is mention of cosmic rays, with participants noting that high-energy protons collide with Earth regularly, but they do not travel at the extreme speeds proposed in the original scenario.
  • Another participant highlights the energy levels of cosmic rays, indicating that while they can reach near-light speeds, they are still below the speed of light and interact with Earth's atmosphere without significant effects.
  • One participant points out the ambiguity in discussing momentum, suggesting that the frame of reference affects the interpretation of the proton's momentum compared to Earth's.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the collision and its consequences, with no consensus reached on the potential effects of a proton colliding with Earth at such high momentum. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent of damage and the mechanics of the collision.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need for relativistic corrections in their discussions, and there are uncertainties regarding the definitions of momentum and kinetic energy in different reference frames.

daveyp225
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
For the sake of argument, say an proton traveling at near light-speed having momentum far exceeding the Earth's were to collide with Earth head on. What would happen in this case? Would the result be any different replacing the proton with a small asteroid of the same momentum? Is it possible the Earth would deflect in the case of an elastic collision?

Since the quantities involved need relativistic correction, I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously, the collision would not be elastic. But, ignoring that...

Since we are asserting it is an elastic collision, the proton and Earth will depart after the collision at the same relative rate that they were closing at before the collision. That being about 1c - but only as seen from point of view of the new Earth trajectory.

Conserving momentum, the average velocity will remain 0.5c.

From the original trajectory, the proton will bounce back at about the speed of light.

Without working through the arithmetic, the Earth would pick up some significant relativist mass and be ejected from its orbit around the sun.

Since we are presuming an elastic collision, the size and shape of the proton/asteroid is not an issue.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
And what might the aftermath be of the expected (non-elastic) collision? It's hard to imagine a proton could do much? That is my motivation for this question
 
daveyp225 said:
And what might the aftermath be of the expected (non-elastic) collision? It's hard to imagine a proton could do much? That is my motivation for this question
The Earth would not stop the Proton - but there would be a substantial amount of energy transferred to the planet.

As the proton passed through the Earth, I would imagine it would loose at least 1% of its momentum and that would be enough to fragment the Earth.
 
High energy protons collide with Earth all the time. See "Cosmic rays". It's about 90% protons.
The Earth is not deflected from his trajectory. And the protons do not go through Earth.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
nasu said:
High energy protons collide with Earth all the time. See "Cosmic rays". It's about 90% protons.
The Earth is not deflected from his trajectory. And the protons do not go through Earth.

But they do not travel at, say, (1-10^(-200))*c.
 
You would be surprised at the energy of some "cosmic rays".

From NASA http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_cr.html#crvel
The velocity of cosmic rays can go from a small fraction of the speed of light up to about .999999999999 times the speed of light. Since cosmic rays are matter (typically the bare nuclei of atoms), they CANNOT exceed the speed of light. They also cannot escape from the event horizon of black holes, but it looks as if black holes can generate relativistic jets of material out along their poles. But these particles are accelerated outside the black hole and so they (and any light generated there as well) can escape.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
nasu said:
High energy protons collide with Earth all the time. See "Cosmic rays". It's about 90% protons.
The Earth is not deflected from his trajectory. And the protons do not go through Earth.

There's an upper limit to the size of cosmic rays. The biggest one detected carried about 50J of energy. I can't find the article now, but I read they can't get much bigger because particles with such mass can interact with the cosmic microwave background radiation. That amount of energy can be absorbed by our atmosphere without much notice.

DaveyP's particle is way, way beyond a cosmic ray. Once it reached the atmosphere (which could only happen if it was created very locally) it would begin interaction immediately.
 
  • #10
Oh, I did not see the "momentum far exceeding the Earth's" part in the OP.
You are right.
 
  • #11
so you want to destroy the Earth with a single proton? It's not true to say a momentum exceeding the momentum of the earth. Depending on the frame, your proton has or has not a momentum, as the earth. So in a frame where the Earth is at rest, any momentum is infinitely bigger than the momentum of the earth. Maybe you want to say the kinetic energy of the proton exceeds the rest mass of the earth...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
958
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K