Very simple log problem - I'm missing something.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Zaent
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
A=12^(1/5)
Log(A)=(1/5)Log(12)

The next part in the book says:

Log(A)=0.2158
A=1.644

I don't know how to do this without a calculator, and with a calculator I'm getting 1.24.

I'm doing e^0.2158

Can anyone please tell me where I'm going wrong here?Note: this isn't homework, just something I've come across
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How old is the book? If old (pre 1980) then the expectation is that you have and use a set of log tables.

Also log(A) implies log to base 10 i.e. 10.1258.
The standard notation for logs to base e is Ln(A).
 
Your mistake is using e and not 10. Base e is used when doing stuff with natural logs ie ln() and 10 is used when doing base 10 logs.

Google can supplement a calculator if one isn't readily available.

The old fashioned way of solving log problems was to use precomputed log tables. Alternatively you could use the ll scales of a decitrig sliderule.
 
Thank you both! I figured the book was old because it was asking me to do this, but I still knew my log knowledge was off somewhere. I'll remember the base 10 thing in future. Thanks again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top