Very simple: second order derivative in wave equation

mr_sparxx
Messages
31
Reaction score
5
In the equation regarding an array of masses connected by springs in wikipedia the step from
$$\frac {u(x+2h,t)-2u(x+h,t)+u(x,t)} { h^2}$$

To
$$\frac {\partial ^2 u(x,t)}{\partial x^2}$$

By making ##h \to 0## is making me wonder how is it rigorously demonstrated. I mean:
$$\frac {\partial ^2 u(x,t)}{\partial x^2} = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac {u_x(x+h,t)-u_x(x,t)} { h}$$
But we have
$$\lim_{h\to 0}\frac {u(x+2h,t)-2u(x+h,t)+u(x,t)} { h^2}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{\frac {u(x+2h)-u(x+h)}{h}-\frac {u(x+h)-u(x)}{h}}{h}$$
How do we demonstrate that these two expressions are equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By the way, I am using $$u_x(x,t) = \frac {\partial u} {\partial x}$$

I keep looking at it and it has to do with continuity, differentiability and properties of limits... but I cannot figure it out. Once again I would like to know the mathematical justification that states that doing the following is safe (I've get rid of the time dependency for simplicity):

$$\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{\frac {u(x+2h)-u(x+h)}{h}-\frac {u(x+h)-u(x)}{h}}{h} =
\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{\lim_{d\to 0}\frac {u(x+h+d)-u(x+h)}{d}-\lim_{d\to 0}\frac {u(x+d)-u(x)}{d}}{h}$$
 
So, we assume that ##u(x)## is a twice continuously differentiable function in an interval ##I## which contains ##a##, and we want to prove that

##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac {u(a+2h)-2u(a+h)+u(a)}{h^2}=u''(a).##

Fix ##h## and put ##\phi(x)=u(x+h)-u(x)## for all ##x## such that both ##x## and ##x+h## lie in ##I##. Assuming that ##a+2h\in I##, we obtain, by the Mean Value Theorem:

##u(a+2h)-2u(a+h)+u(a)=\phi(a+h)-\phi(a)=\phi'(a+\theta h)h=(u'(a+\theta h +h) - u'(a+\theta h))h,##

for some ##\theta \in (0,1)##.

Then, you can use the Mean Value Theorem again and use that ##u''## is continuous at ##a## to obtain the desired result. I leave this as an exercise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mr_sparxx
I see. Then, using the Mean Value Theorem again

##(a+2h)-2u(a+h)+u(a)=(u'(a+\theta h +h) - u'(a+\theta h))h = u''(a+\theta h + \lambda h) h^2##

for some ##\lambda \in (0,1)##, and using that ##u''(x)## is continuous,

##\lim_{h\to 0} \frac {u(a+2h)-2u(a+h)+u(a)}{h^2}=\lim_{h\to 0} u''(a+(\theta + \lambda) h) =u''(a) .##Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Back
Top