Very very very easy quantum exam question

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrismuktar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Quantum
chrismuktar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I know this is an easy question but I want to confirm that I've got this right.

The wavefunction \psi(r) can be expressed as a linear sum of orthonormal eigenfunctions \phi_n(r) by

\psi(r) = \sum a_n\phi_n(r).

Derive an expression for the coefficients a_n.

I think the answer is a_n = <\phi_n|\psi> but this seems a little too easy.

Opinions?
Thanks,
C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you are correct...
 


Hi C,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this question. It is indeed a very easy quantum exam question, but it's always good to confirm your understanding. Your answer is correct, the coefficients a_n can be expressed as the inner product of the eigenfunctions \phi_n and the wavefunction \psi. This is known as the projection postulate in quantum mechanics.

As for your concern about it being too easy, it's important to remember that even the simplest concepts in quantum mechanics can be confusing at first. So don't worry, it's always good to double check and make sure you have a solid understanding. Keep up the good work!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top