Vibration: find the stiffness of the spring

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the calculation of the stiffness of springs required to mount a machine, with the goal of achieving a specific transmissibility ratio in the context of vibration analysis. The problem includes considerations of harmonic forces, damping, and the physical characteristics of the machine and springs.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the assumptions needed for the problem, suggesting that they feel like guesswork.
  • Another participant questions the basis for considering the calculated stiffness value as "stupidly high," prompting a discussion about what constitutes a reasonable benchmark for such values.
  • A participant shares their calculation process, including the determination of angular frequency and the rearrangement of formulas, but expresses doubt about the correctness of their results.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the transmissibility ratio formula, emphasizing the implications of a frequency ratio close to 1, which could lead to resonant conditions contrary to the desired outcome.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the appropriateness of the calculated stiffness value, with some questioning its validity while others challenge the criteria for what is considered "too high." The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to the problem and the implications of the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for justifying assumptions and expectations in calculations, as well as the potential impact of machine weight on spring compression. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in determining appropriate values for stiffness in this context.

bigbang42
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a machine of mass 100 tonne generates a simple harmonic disturbing force when operating at a speed of 200rpm. to protect the floor and surrounding machinery it is proposed tp mount the machine on helical springs so that the transmissibility ratio is reduced to 0.1

Q1 determine the total stiffness of the springs required assuming the damping to be negligible ??

I'm having with this question because apparently certain sections you have to make "assumptions" which to me is more like guess work


Homework Equations



ωn = sqrt ( k/m)

tr = \sqrt{(1 + ( 2ζ ω/ωn) / ((1 - (ω/ωn)^2)^2 + (2ζ ω/ωn)^2) }





The Attempt at a Solution



right what I've done is I've said that ζ=0 which gets rid of anything in the tr formula with ζ in as obviously anything multiplied by 0 is 0

so that leaves sqrt [ 1 / ((1-(ω/ωn)^2)^2) ]

i found ω is 200/60 x 2pi so you get something like ω=(20/3)pi

i then rearranged the tr formula two lines above to get ωn = 20

then used the formula ωn= sqrt (k/m)

rearranged to get k = ωn^2 x m and got a stupidly high answer so i imagine i done all the above wrong

can anyone give me any steps on what to do or where I'm going wrong, i have been tearing my hair out over it :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think the result is "stupidly high"?
It is a 100T machine, after all. So what are you using as your benchmark for "high"?
 
i got something silly like 3.9x10^8 for my k value in the end, is that not too high ?
 
"too high" compared with what?

what sort of value were you expecting and why?
(get into the habit of justifying your hunches.)

i.e.
How far would that 100T machine compress the springs under gravity alone?
What would happen to that compression under the kind of value you were expecting?
i.e. how tall would the springs have to be just to support the machine off the floor?
i.e. how long are industrial springs ... normally?
 
Letting you off the hook:
With no damping, the transmissibility ratio is $$Tr=\frac{1}{\left | 1-\frac{\omega^2}{\omega_0^2}\right |}$$ ... This is the same as yours, but written more clearly so you can see what is going on better.
Bearing this in mind, you told us:
i found ω is 200/60 x 2pi so you get something like ω=(20/3)pi
i then rearranged the tr formula two lines above to get ωn = 20
Notice that ω = 20π/3 ≈ 20 also ... which suggests a frequency ratio close to 1 - or resonant transmissibility (Tr → ∞): the opposite of what is wanted. The question calls for Tr=1/10 ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K