"Violating" Einstein's Photoelectric Effect Model - Comments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a post by ZapperZ regarding potential violations of Einstein's Photoelectric Effect model. Participants highlight the elegance of Einstein's original model compared to more complex extensions, which are crucial for technological advancements. There is speculation about whether these violations could enhance the efficiency of photovoltaic cells, particularly through methods like multi-photon processes. The conversation also touches on the role of concentrated solar power, where mirrors focus light onto solar cells, potentially improving energy conversion. Overall, while efficiency gains from these ideas may be modest, they could still provide valuable improvements.
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
ZapperZ submitted a new PF Insights post

"Violating" Einstein's Photoelectric Effect Model

photoelectric-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you ZapperZ for a thoughtful insight article! The simplest cases such the one addressed by Einstein are typically the most beautiful and elegant ones. The extensions that comes later such as the electric field effect, heat effect or mutli-photon processes are typically the most labor-intensive less beautiful but technologically important cases.
 
Nice article Zz!
 
I was wondering if these violations of Einstein's rule could be used to make photo voltaic cells more efficient? Keep in mind that with the concentrated solar principal (more info here http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540856/doe-attempts-to-jump-start-concentrated-solar/ ) acres of mirrors can concentrate light onto a few solar cells. Thank you for your time!
 
There are some ideas how infrared light can get converted to visible light (with sufficient energy per photon to be used by the cell) by combining the energy of at least two photons. The efficiency gain won't be large, but maybe better than nothing.
Mirrors are independent of all those ideas.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top